"Virgen de las Nieves" University Hospital
Granada, 18014, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04232176
This study evaluates the ability of endoscopists to perform a complete optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps between 5 and 15 mm, and the impact of the only endoscopic diagnosis on the follow-up program for those patients. This is a prospective study in which we compare the diagnosis regarding size and histology made by the endoscopist versus de pathologic diagnosis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Granada, 18014, Spain
Background: Optical diagnosis of colonic polyps is an attractive possibility and a common practice. However, recommendations and the main decision concerning patients' management still rely on histological diagnosis, with controversial results in previous studies, usually designed to analyze the accuracy of this diagnosis in the setting of a 'resect and discard' or 'diagnose and leave' strategy. However, little has been studied on this diagnosis on polyps of about 10 mm, the threshold for the consideration as a high risk adenoma, that need a 3 year colonoscopy, or, in case of a smaller adenoma, with a recommended revision in 5 years. Some studies have addressed the accuracy when estimating the polyp size, and others the histology by means of virtual or optical chromoendoscopy, but no one has studied both parameters, that are the two pillars in which a revision program for the patient is decided.
Hypothesis: Our main purpose is to determine the accuracy of the complete optical diagnosis as made by the endoscopist in the endoscopy room, in order to give recommendations immediately after the colonoscopy, with no need of further histological analyses.
Aims:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Immediate after the polyps detection
Optical diagnosis accuracy (endoscopist) when compared to the Pathologic report
Time frame: Immediate after resection and within 10 days after polyp resection to allow pathologic diagnosis
Comparison of sizes after resection and after formaline and pathologic diagnosis
Time frame: 5 years after the index resection
Polyps recurrence after long-term follow up for advanced adenoma (Rate)
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
Other
Acronym: POPS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00018551
Adenoma, Colon Cancer
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00997802
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02529007
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01200303
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details