Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
NCT Number: NCT01496781
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been widely used as a diagnostic and treatment techniques of gastrointestinal small lesions. Para-procedure bleeding is one of the common complication following EMR. Several endoscopic hemostasis methods are currently in use including metallic hemoclip. EndoClot® absorbable polysaccharide hemostat (PAPH) as a new hemostasis material was previously used for surgical hemostasis, but the therapeutic effect and safety in endoscopic application remains unknown. This randomized controlled study has been designed to compare PAPH with metallic hemoclip in their hemostatic effect of intra-procedure bleeding control and rebleeding prevention during and after EMR.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Hemoclip application is a standard treatment option after endoscopic mucosal resection of colonic lesion to stop and prevent post-procedure bleeding.
Other names: metallic hemoclip (Cat# HX-610-090L, Olympus)
EndoClot hemostat is applied immediately after EMR to achieve hemostasis.
Other names: EndoClot® Absorbable Polysaccharide Hemostat (Cat# Y2007090722, Starch Medical Inc)
Time frame: Up to half an hour immediately after EMR procedure to ensure successful management is achieved.
Initial hemostatsis was observed endoscopically immediately after application of hemoclip or Endoclot. Complete hemostatsis is ensured. Endoscopic combined hemostasis or emergency surgery would be applied if severe bleeding occurred and endoscopic management fails
Time frame: up to 1 month
Colonoscopy will be repeated 1 month after EMR procedure to observe if application of Endoclot will delay the musosal healing.
Time frame: Up to half an hour immediately after EMR procedure to ensure successful management is achieved.
The time taken to achieve hemostasis is recorded immediately after EMR procedure to reflect the technical difficulty of hemostasis measure.
Time frame: up to 1 week
Rebleeding rate up to 1 week was obtained by clinical manifestations such as melana; decreased hemoglobin > 20g/L; hemodynamic instability or active bleeding from mucosal defect under endoscope.
Time frame: up to 1 month
Gastrointestinal tract obstruction has been previously reported as a possible adverse effect of hemostats, therefore it was observed in the current study.
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Other
EndoClotTM Absorbable Polysaccharide Hemostat in Comparison With Metallic Hemoclip for Hemostasis and Preventing Post-procedure Bleeding After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: a Prospective, Randomized Trial
Acronym: EMR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01735786
Colonic Polyps, Endoscopic Hemostasis
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07563816
Adenoma, Adenomatous Polyps
Hořovice, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06916845
Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02198729
Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details