Westmead Endoscopy Unit
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
NCT Number: NCT02198729
The investigators have recently become proficient in a new, and we believe more effective technique for polyp removal. Known as Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). ESD involves removing the polyp in one piece. It is preferable to remove the polyp in one piece as it minimises the chance of leaving residual polyp tissue behind. There have also been recent studies overseas that have shown this new technique to be quite effective. In this study, half of the patients will receive the newly developed technique of polyp removal (ESD), while the other half will receive conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) treatment. This study will allow us to show which technique results in lower recurrence rates and is more effective.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
EMR is a very effective procedure for lesions smaller than 20 mm. With this size the polyp can be removed en bloc. En bloc resection is preferred as it minimises the likelihood of residual adenoma and enhances histological assessment. It is also curative in superficially invasive submucosal disease. It eliminates the need for surgery in these patients. With lesions larger than 20 mm, the lesion is removed piece meal, often in more than 5 pieces. Care is taken to ensure that no adenoma is left behind at the point of overlap between snare resections. However, for every additional snare resection, there is the possibility that a small amount of adenoma will be left behind at this overlap point. Overall, the literature suggests that there is approximately a 15% residual adenoma rate at repeat colonoscopy in 3 months, which requires further treatment. With en bloc resection residual adenoma rate at repeat colonoscopy in is close to 0%. This has to be balanced against the relative inexperience with performing ESD, longer procedure time and higher complication rates. A randomized trial near completion is comparing endoscopic snare resection with transanal surgical resection for rectal polyps (24). Should this trial show that en bloc resection is superior in achieving complete resection without recurrence at similar complication rates, the endoscopic treatment strategy of large colorectal adenomas should be reconsidered. Since en bloc resection is technically more challenging, this should have consequences for credentialing, referral patterns and performance of removal of large colorectal polyps in reference centers only. Thus, before en bloc resection is promoted as superior, and training has to be intensified to comply with standards of safe oncologic resection of these lesions, the efficacy and safety have to be proven in a comparative randomized trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 18 months
Recurrence rate - free of adenoma endoscopically and histologically on 2 subsequent examinations
Time frame: 14 days
Rate of en bloc resection
Time frame: 14 days
Rate of initial technical success
Time frame: up to 3 years
Recurrence tissue observed at follow up colonoscopies over a 3 year period
Time frame: 14 days
Safety outcomes measured in the form of follow up phone calls.
Professor Michael Bourke
Other
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Polyps and Laterally Spreading Lesions of the Rectum - a Prospective Randomised Trial
Acronym: RESDEMR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07563816
Adenoma, Adenomatous Polyps
Hořovice, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06916845
Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02196649
Colonic Polyps, Intestinal Polyps
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06596317
Adenoma, Adenoma Detection Rate
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial Details