Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02265601

End-of-Life Health Care Decisions by Patients With Advanced Cancer

This study is designed to help the investigators understand more about how people plan for their future medical needs, a process known as "advance care planning."

The study is under the direction of Michael J. Green, M.D., and Benjamin Levi, M.D. physicians at Penn State Hershey Medical Center.

Participation in the project takes place during a single visit to the Medical Center campus. During this one-to-three hour visit, participants complete several questionnaires and use a computer program that produces a printed advance directive that can be shared with their physicians and loved ones. Participants will receive compensation toward travel expenses.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Background: Despite widespread agreement that individuals ought to plan for their medical futures, few people (even seriously ill patients with cancer) actually complete advance directives, fewer yet understand key elements, and even when advance directives do exist, there are often barriers to their being implemented.

Objectives: The investigators innovative, multimedia, interactive, computer-based decision aid, "Making Your Wishes Known: Planning Your Medical Future," offers tailored education, values clarification exercises, and a sophisticated decision aid that translates an individual's goals and preferences into a specific medical plan that can be implemented by a health care team. This project aims to evaluate its impact on decision-making and health care received by individuals at the end of life in a randomized clinical trial among a population of patients with advanced cancer who have life expectancies of < 12 months.

Specific Aims:

Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of a computer-based advance care planning intervention on end-of-life decision-making by cancer patients with estimated life expectancies < 12 months. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to standard care (paper/pencil living will form), use of the computer-based intervention will:

H1: Improve individuals' decision-making about end-of-life health care

H2: Improve individuals' experience with the process of advance care planning

H3: Not increase individuals' hopelessness or anxiety, nor harm the doctor-patient relationship

Aim 2: To evaluate the impact of the investigators intervention on end-of-life health care received by cancer patients with estimated life expectancies < 12 months. The investigators hypothesize that, compared to standard care, use of the computer intervention will:

H4: Increase physician awareness of individuals' health care wishes

H5: Increase physician adherence to individuals' health care wishes

Study Design: Randomized, controlled pre-intervention/post-intervention trial comparing a computer-based educational intervention with standard care

Cancer Relevance: Patients with advanced cancer face many medical decisions, some of which must be made when the patient cannot speak for him or herself. Helping these individuals to effectively articulate and communicate their wishes, in advance, can help assure that treatment they receive is consistent with their values, goals and wishes. This study aims to test the effectiveness of the investigators' computer-based intervention. If successful, this intervention can help improve the quality of health care received by cancer patients at the end of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • able to give informed consent
  • interested in participating in advance care planning
  • able to read and understand English at an 8th grade level (per WRAT-3 screening test)
  • advanced cancer (primary or metastatic), with estimated lifespan < 6 months (as determined by their treating physician)
  • cognitively able to engage in advance care planning (Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score >23)
  • absence of moderate or severe depression (BDI-II score <20/63)

Exclusion criteria

  • unable to read and understand English at an 8th grade level (per Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-3))
  • not cognitively able to engage in advance care planning (Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score < 23)
  • moderate or severe depression (BDI-II score >20/63)

Treatment and study plan

computer-based decision aid

Other

Offers tailored education, values clarification exercises, and a sophisticated decision aid that translates an individual's goals and preferences into a specific medical plan that can be implemented by a health care team.

Other names: "Making Your Wishes Known: Planning Your Medical Future"

Standard care

Other

paper/pencil living will form

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant knowledge of advance care planning

    Time frame: Pre and post-intervention

    Knowledge of advance care planning will be compared between control and intervention groups, using a true/false and multiple choice questionnaire about advance care planning.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant decisional conflict

    Time frame: post-intervention

    Assessment of conflict associated with making end-of-life decisions will be assessed with the decisional conflict scale.

  2. Participant satisfaction with decision

    Time frame: post-intervention

    Assessment of satisfaction with decisions associated with advance care planning will be assessed with the satisfaction with decision scale.

  3. Participant satisfaction with advance care planning

    Time frame: post-intervention

    Satisfaction with with advance care planning process will be compared between intervention and control group with a satisfaction questionnaire.

  4. Participant self-determination

    Time frame: pre and post-intervention

    Self determination will be compared between intervention and control group with a self-determination questionnaire.

  5. Participant anxiety

    Time frame: pre and post-intervention

    Pre and post-intervention anxiety will be compared between intervention and control group with the state trait anxiety instrument.

  6. Participant hopelessness

    Time frame: pre and post-intervention

    Assessment of pre and post-intervention hopelessness will be compared between intervention and control group using the Beck Hopelessness scale and a measure of hopefulness.

  7. Physician awareness of patients' health care wishes

    Time frame: post-death chart review

    Comparison will be made between intervention and control group regarding whether an advance directive is present in the patient's medical record, and whether the physician is aware of the patient's wishes.

  8. Physician adherence to patients' health care wishes

    Time frame: post-death chart review

    Comparison will be made between intervention and control group regarding whether patients' wishes are followed at the end of life.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • American Cancer Society, Inc.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Oct 16, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 14, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.