Scaling and Root Planing
ProcedureUsing minimally invasive surgical procedure (scaling and root planing) with Emdogain application to treat one contra-lateral quadrant in subject's jaw.
NCT Number: NCT02551770
The aim of this controlled study is to assess the clinical outcomes and patient reported outcomes of using minimally invasive surgical procedure with Straumann Emdogain as an adjunct (test treatment) or without Straumann Emdogain (control treatment).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Clinique Paro Excellence, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The aim of the study will be achieved through the following primary and secondary objectives. The primary objective is to evaluate the regenerative potential of Straumann Emdogain by comparing the change in clinical attachment level from baseline to 12 months between the test and control arms. The regenerative potential of Straumann Emdogain will also be assessed by comparing the changes in gingival margins, changes in average probing pocket depth, changes in full mouth plaque score, changes in bleeding on probing, and changes in root dentin hypersensitivity from baseline to 12 months between the test and control arms.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Using minimally invasive surgical procedure (scaling and root planing) with Emdogain application to treat one contra-lateral quadrant in subject's jaw.
Using minimally invasive surgical procedure (scaling and root planing) without Emdogain application to treat one contra-lateral quadrant in subject's jaw.
Using minimally invasive surgical procedure (scaling and root planing) with Emdogain application to treat one contra-lateral quadrant in subject's jaw
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
CAL will be measured in millimeters on the study teeth at 6 locations. Outcome is mean change of CAL from baseline measurements at surgery to 12-months post-surgery, taken from the deepest pocket of a patient's test and control teeth measured at baseline. Analysis will compare the mean change of CAL for test and control treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
GM will be measured in millimeters on the study teeth at 6 locations. Outcome is mean change of GM from baseline at surgery to 12-months-post surgery, taken from the deepest pocket of a patient's test and control teeth measured at baseline. Analysis will compare the mean change of GM for test and control treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
PPD will be measured in millimeters on the study teeth in 6 locations. Outcome is mean change of PPD from baseline at surgery to 12-months post-surgery, taken from the deepest pocket of a patient's test and control teeth at baseline. Analysis will compare the mean change of PPD for test and control treatment arms.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
FMPS will be calculated based on the number of tooth surfaces with plaque over the total number of tooth surfaces x 100. The value is presented as a percent. The difference in FMPS between 12 months and baseline will be determined.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
For the categorical variable BoP, the frequency of bleeding (present or absent) will be counted (absolute and in percent) over all measured sites around the identified study teeth for each treatment group. The results will be compared between the 12-month follow-up and baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
Presence of root dentin hypersensitivity will be recorded as "none" (no reaction from the subject), "mild" (sensible with no pain), "moderate" (sensible with slight pain), or "severe" (sensible with pain that persists for a while) after a conventional air blast is applied to the study tooth. Changes in the frequency of categories will be determined and compared between the two treatment arms. An improvement is defined as a decreased reaction (for example, severe to mild), a deterioration is defined as increased reaction (for example, none to moderate), and unchanged is no change to reaction (for example, mild to mild).
Time frame: 1-2 days post surgery, 1 week post surgery, and 2 weeks post surgery
Post-surgical pain will be measured on a 100 millimeter visual analog scale. The range is 0 (no pain) to 99 (nearly maximum pain). The lower the value, the better the outcome. The subjects will be instructed to mark their level of pain on a line for both the test quadrant and the control quadrant. The average change in pain level will be determined and compared between the two arms.
Institut Straumann AG
Industry
Straumann® Emdogain® Application In Conjunction With Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique For Periodontal Disease Treatment: A Split-Mouth Design Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07731412
Body Weight, Mouth Diseases
Târgu Mureş, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT06366295
Mouth Diseases, Periodontal Diseases
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07721337
Mouth Diseases, Periodontal Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07488403
Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis
Antalya, KONYAALTI, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details