Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04692285

Electrophysiological and Neuroimaging Correlates of the Effect of Zolpidem in Patients With Focal Dystonia

To study electrophysiological and imaging correlations of the clinical effectiveness of zolpidem in task-specific dystonia and to elucidate mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects, patients with focal dystonia will be clinically evaluated and will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation and FDG-PET CT brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo, in two separate sessions. Resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), resting and active input/output (IO) curve, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) curve, long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), and cortical silent period (CSP) will be measured. Objective clinical improvement will be rated using Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-movement (BFM-M) and writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS). Subjective improvement will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Only a subset of patients (10 patients) will undergo positron emission tomography with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: The present view of dystonia is as of a circuit disorder, involving basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical and cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathways. One of the key pathophysiological features of dystonia is decreased inhibition at several levels of the central nervous system. The lack of inhibition may account for many of the dystonic symptoms, such as co-contraction of antagonistic muscles, loss of selectivity in muscle activation during movement, or overflow of dystonic symptoms in body parts not engaged in the movement. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS). Studies in animal models, as well as neuroimaging and electrophysiological data on dystonic patients, provide evidence of abnormal GABA neurotransmission in dystonia. Currently, there is no cure for dystonia, but there are several symptomatic treatment options, including medications and surgical approaches. While only a minority of dystonia patients is eligible for deep brain stimulation most affected individuals are dependent on pharmacological treatments for symptomatic relief. These include botulinum toxin injections and oral medications. Botulinum toxin injection treatment is effective in focal and segmental dystonia, but it requires repeated injections, may be associated with resistance to treatment, and is expensive. Available oral medications are however not very effective (particularly in adult dystonia patients) and may be associated with intolerable adverse effects. Consequently, research into the use of new pharmaceuticals approaches is warranted. Zolpidem is a widely used hypnotic agent that potentiates GABA transmission, as a selective agonist of the benzodiazepine subtype receptor α1. Zolpidem has been recently reported in an open-labeled study to be effective in primary focal and generalized dystonia, with the effect being variable among different dystonia patients.

Aims: To study electrophysiological correlations of the clinical effectiveness of zolpidem in task-specific dystonia and to elucidate mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects, which have not yet been investigated.

Hypotheses: Taking into account reports in the literature, we believe we will be able to prove zolpidem is more effective in improving focal dystonia than placebo. Since zolpidem acts as an agonist in GABA-A receptors, we believe it will enhance TMS measures that are known to be mediated true GABA-A signaling. We hypothesize that the effects of zolpidem on electrophysiological measures will correlate with the patient's response to treatment.

Patients and inclusion/exclusion criteria: Thirty patients with writer's cramp or musician dystonia will be recruited from the outpatient clinic for extrapyramidal disorders. Patients treated with botulinum toxin within the last 3 months and patients with contraindications for TMS will be excluded. Patients will not be allowed to take benzodiazepines, zolpidem, or other sedative drugs for 48 hours prior to the experiment. No changes in medications before and during the whole study apart from study-related drug intervention will be allowed.

Study protocol: 30 patients will undergo TMS after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo, in two separate sessions. Objective clinical improvement will be rated using Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-movement (BFM-M) and writer's cramp rating scale (WCRS). Subjective improvement will be measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, 10 patients will undergo positron emission tomography with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) brain imaging after a single 5 mg dose of zolpidem and placebo.

Methods:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Single TMS pulses will be applied using Magstim 2002 magnetic stimulator with monophasic waveform (Magstim Company, Carmarthenshire, Wales, UK). For double TMS pulses, we will use two Magstim 2002 stimulators connected with the Bistim module. The stimulators will be connected to a standard figure 8 coil. The coil will be positioned tangentially to the skull and over the 'hotspot' point on the scalp, with the handle pointing backward at an angle of ~ 45 ° with respect to the sagittal plane. Hotspot point is defined as stimulation site resulting in the largest motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded over the contralateral abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. A hotspot point will be found by visual inspection. The MEP amplitude in APB muscle will be measured with electromyography (EMG).

Statistical analysis: Clinical and TMS measures on zolpidem and placebo will be compared using parametric or nonparametric T-test or repeated-measures ANOVA. Correlations will be tested using Spearman analysis. Statistical parametric mapping (SPM8; paired t-test, p<0.001) will be used to identify the zolpidem effect on global brain metabolism.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of writer's cramp or musician dystonia

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients treated with botulinum toxin within the last 3 months
  • Patients with contraindications for TMS
  • Patients taking benzodiazepines, zolpidem or other sedative drugs 48 hours prior to the experiment

Treatment and study plan

zolpidem

Drug

Patients will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation, 18F-FDG-PET brain imaging, and clinical testing after a single 5 mg dose of Zolpidem.

Placebo

Drug

Patients will undergo transcranial magnetic stimulation, 18F-FDG-PET brain imaging, and clinical testing after a single dose of placebo.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the transcranial magnetic stimulation measures between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation measures (resting and active cortical motor threshold, resting and active input-output curve, short intracortical inhibition, long intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation) after zolpidem 5 mg and placebo will be compared.

  2. Change in brain metabolism detected on FDG-PET CT brain imaging between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

    FDG-PET CT brain imaging

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMS) between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

    Dystonia can be objectively assessed using the BFMS. The BFMS is subdivided into a movement scale and a disability scale. Only the movement scale will be used. The minimum total score is 0, the maximal total score is 120. Patients who are more affected with dystonia get higher scores.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in The Writer's Cramp Rating Scale (WCRS) between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

    The writer's cramp dystonia can be objectively assessed using WCRS. The minimum score on WCRS is 0 and the maximum score is 30. The WCRS consists of two subscores, the writing movement score with the minimum score 0 and the maximum score 28 and the writing speed score with the minimum score 0 and the maximum score 2. The higher the score, the more is a patient affected with the writer's cramp dystonia.

  2. Change in the Visual Analog Score between zolpidem 5 mg and placebo

    Time frame: 30 minutes after the intervention

    To subjectively assess dystonia, the Visual Analog Scale will be used. The minimum score on the scale will be 0 and the maximum score will be 10. A higher score will mean a greater impairment due to the presence of dystonia.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Other

Collaborators

  • Clinical Centre of Serbia
  • Slovenian Research Agency

Registry information

Official study title

Targeting New Receptors in Dystonia: Electrophysiological and Neuroimaging Correlates of the Effect of Zolpidem, a Selective Agonist of Benzodiazepine Subtype Receptor alfa1, in Different Forms of Primary Focal Dystonia

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Dec 31, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.