Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02609321

Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block in the Reduction of Acute Post-surgical Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer

Surgical treatment of breast cancer is frequently associated with postoperative pain in the surgical area. Persistent pain after breast cancer management has considerable negative effects on the quality of life of survivors. The aim of this trials is to evaluate the efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block with bupivacine 0.5% in reducing the acute pain postmastectomy compare with surgical wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.5%.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Instituto de Cancerología IDC Las Américas

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

About this study

Surgical treatment of breast cancer is frequently associated with postoperative pain in the surgical area, restricted movement of the ipsilateral upper limb and increased risk of chronic pain. This usually occurs even though management with analgesics commonly used in the postoperative period. Properly treatment of acute postoperative pain have essential implications: improving the general welfare of patients, can better withstand future medical interventions, facilitating recovery in the short and long term and is believed to have positive impact on survival from cancer.

Persistent pain after breast cancer management has considerable negative effects on the quality of life of survivors. Several risks factors have been described in preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative periods of persistent or chronic pain. In the postoperative period the most important risk factor is the severity of acute pain. For this, pain relief is an essential component of care of patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Current evidence suggests that treatment of acute postoperative pain reduces the risk of persistent or chronic pain syndrome. The surgical wound infiltration with local anesthesia has been used routinely in patients managed at the Cancer Institute and Clinica Las Americas and is described as a safe and accessible procedure for the management of acute postoperative pain. Paravertebral block represents an interesting alternative in the management of perioperative pain, often used for breast surgery, hernia repair and thoracotomy in children and adults. Although complications associated with blocking are uncommon, the implementation of Ultrasound-guided approach has become the standard for performing said method.

Such considerations have led us to evaluate whether patients with breast cancer who are undergoing mastectomy, thoracic paravertebral block could be better in relief acute pain in comparison with surgical wound infiltration with local anesthesia. This will be studied by controlled randomized to one of two intervention groups (paravertebral block or local anesthesia with infiltration of the surgical wound) allocation trial. In all patients, general anesthesia and routine postoperative analgesic is used.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women older than 18 years.
  • Diagnosis of breast cancer requiring major elective surgery: unilateral mastectomy with or without axillary dissection; with or without axillary sentinel node biopsy; with or without immediate breast reconstruction.
  • Willingness to participate in the study during the follow-up period.

Exclusion criteria

  • Metastatic breast carcinoma; tumor involvement of contra lateral breast or armpit determined by clinical or paraclinical studies.
  • Medical History of coagulopathy.
  • Consumption of anticoagulants.
  • Contraindication to NSAIDs or opioids.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics of amide type.
  • Infection a interventions sites (paravertebral block or area affected breast surgical wound)
  • Pregnancy and lactation.
  • BMI>35.
  • Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease or other diseases that affect the mental or motor sphere.
  • Double mastectomy or mastectomy history of previous ipsilateral to the current episode.
  • Preoperative risk classification ASA IV-V.

Treatment and study plan

Thoracic Paravertebral Block

Procedure

Thoracic paravertebral block at T3 level with bupivacaine 0.5%, dosis 1.5mg/Kg

Surgical Wound Infiltration

Procedure

Surgical wound infiltration on the skin and subcutaneous tissue in surgical area with bipivacaine 0.5%, dosis 1.5mg/kg

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute post-surgical pain at rest and motion

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Acute pain at rest and in motion at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours post operative, measured by a visual analog scale (0-100 mm) for the paravertebral block group compared with the surgical wound infiltration group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 2 months

    Compare the frequency and severity of adverse events in both groups

  2. Total doses of opioids

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Compare the total dose of self-administered opioids analgesics for the first 24 hours

  3. Time to the first dose of opioids

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Compare the time to first dose of opioids analgesics in both groups

  4. Post-mastectomy pain syndrome

    Time frame: 2 months

    Compare the frequency of diagnosis of Post-mastectomy pain syndrome (SDP) two months after breast surgery in both groups

  5. Quality of life

    Time frame: 2 months

    Estimate the changes in the quality of life of patients after two months after breast surgery in both groups

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Cancerología S.A.

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block vs Local Anesthesia of the Surgical Wound in Reduction of Acute Post-surgical Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer. Controlled Phase III, Randomized, Single-blind, Superiority Clinical Trial.

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 20, 2015
Registry last updated
Dec 26, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.