Faculty of physical therapy, Cairo University
Giza, 11432, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05988255
This study will be conducted to compare the effectiveness of static progressive stretching using the joint active system (JAS) shoulder device with cyclic manual stretching and controls on shoulder range of motion (ROM), time to gain ROM, and function in patients with adhesive capsulitis. The study includes three groups. Group A (15 patients) will receive static progressive stretch using the JAS device. Group B (15 patients) will receive cyclic manual stretching in flexion, abduction, and external and internal rotations. Group C (15 patients) is a control group that will receive no treatment until the end of the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Giza, 11432, Egypt
The study design: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial (therapy, level 1B). A flow diagram according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement will be presented to illustrate the progression of the study.
The sample size is calculated using G*power software (version 3.1.9.7, Franz Faul, Universitat Kiel, Germany) and it suggests that 42 participants (14 per group) will be needed using the MANOVA test. Cohen's d is set to be 0.25 with 80% power (alpha = 0.05) to detect an effect size.
Patients are randomly assigned to either of three groups (A, B, or C) using a computer-generated list. They are allocated by an outside party who isn't involved in the treatment using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes.
Inclusion criteria
(1) Patients of both genders with unilateral primary adhesive capsulitis (2) Patients aged between 40-65. (3) Pain duration of three months or more. (4) Range of motion loss of greater than 25% in at least 2 planes and passive external rotation loss that is greater than 50% of the uninvolved shoulder or less than 30° of external rotation.
Exclusion criteria
(1) Previous surgery or manipulation under anesthesia. (2) Other conditions affecting the shoulder as (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff disease, or malignancies). (3) Neurological deficits affecting shoulder function.
Demographic data will be collected for all subjects regarding age, gender, dominance, and painful side. After patient selection according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we will measure shoulder range of motion (ROM) using a Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer, and shoulder function using the SPADI scale.
Range of motion will be assessed at baseline (before the start of treatment), at the end of each week, and at the end of 12 weeks.
Shoulder function will be assessed using SPADI at baseline (before the start of treatment) and at the end of treatment.
The mean time needed to reach ROM at 3 months will be assessed in each group and compared between groups.
Treatment procedures:
All patients in the three groups will be educated about the natural history of the disease and instructed to stay active at home through encouraging activity modification without pain. Each patient in the treatment groups will receive two treatment sessions per week for a series of 12 weeks.
Statistical analysis:
Data will be analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) computer program version 24 software (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Descriptive statistics will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables.
The normality of data will be examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test.
Repeated measures ANOVA test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for the ROM and time to gain ROM within each group.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test will be used to determine the difference between baseline and post-treatment scores for pain and function.
Kruskal Wallis ANOVA will be used for pain and function scores difference between groups (ordinal data).
A MANOVA test will be used to identify the difference between the three groups regarding ROM (flexion, extension, abduction, internal rotation, external rotation in adduction, and external rotation in abduction).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A stretching technique applies a mechanical progressive stretch
Other names: Stretching exercises
A stretching technique applies an intermittent manual stretch
Other names: Stretching exercises
Time frame: Three months
Shoulder flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation will be measured using Baseline Digital Absolute Axis Goniometer
Time frame: Three months
The patient will be advised to select the number that best reflects the intensity of their discomfort and the degree of trouble they are having using the affected shoulder using SPADI.
Time frame: Three months
Mean time needed to reach ROM at 3 months will be assessed in each group and compared between groups.
Cairo University
Other
Efficacy of Static Progressive Stretching Technique Versus Traditional Stretching in Primary Adhesive Capsulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07723755
Adhesive Capsulitis, Bursitis
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07710651
Adhesive Capsulitis, Bursitis
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06493656
Adhesive Capsulitis, Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder
Chuncheon, Gangwondo, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05909462
Adhesive Capsulitis, Bursitis
Çorum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details