Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02643394

Efficacy of Oral vs. Intravenous Acetaminophen

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen in the management of postoperative pain is understudied and largely unknown. In this observer blinded randomized clinical trial, investigators aim to determine the comparative efficacy of PO (preoperative) vs. IV (intraoperative) acetaminophen in a sinus surgery population.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Zale Lipshy University Hospital

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

About this study

The comparative efficacy of intravenous (IV) to oral (PO-'per os') acetaminophen is understudied and largely unknown. Intravenous acetaminophen has been available since 2010 (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022450lbl.pdf) and has proven superiority over placebo in human clinical trials. It is clearly advantageous in patients who cannot take oral medications. Similarly, oral acetaminophen has proven efficacy in the management of postoperative pain.

However, in patients who can receive either formulation the incremental cost of the IV formulation, both to the Health System and patient, is substantial. This incremental cost would be justifiable if there were clear efficacy or safety data to support the preferential use of IV over PO acetaminophen.

However, there is no evidence of superior safety and there are only two studies to our knowledge investigating the question of comparative efficacy. Fenlon et al. randomized 130 patients undergoing 3rd molar (i.e., wisdom tooth) removal to IV vs. PO acetaminophen and found that PO acetaminophen was non-inferior to IV acetaminophen. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain score 1h after surgery. No safety concerns were identified in either group. Pettersson et al. randomized cardiac surgery patients to IV or PO acetaminophen, starting immediately postoperatively through the following morning, and found a significant opioid sparing effect of IV acetaminophen but no difference in pain scores or nausea.

IV acetaminophen avoids first-pass hepatic metabolism and therefore generates higher serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/brain levels than does PO acetaminophen (http://ofirmev.com/Pharmacokinetics/). Based on the pharmacokinetic data, one can hypothesize that IV acetaminophen would be superior to PO acetaminophen at time points where serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid drug levels are higher.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Undergoing elective sinus surgery at Zale Lipshy Hospital

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability of the patient to follow directions or comprehend either English or Spanish language.
  • Disorders of the liver which would make acetaminophen contraindicated (such as hepatitis, liver failure, prior liver transplant, etc).
  • Patients with chronic pain manifest by a baseline pain score > 4/10
  • Chronic opioid use (>2 weeks continuously), or illicit drug abuse
  • Body weight < 50 kg.
  • Patients with contraindications to any of the study drugs (such as Malignant Hyperthermia susceptible, celecoxib or sulfa allergy, etc.).
  • Patients who have taken analgesic medications on the morning of surgery (prior to arrival).
  • Allergy to acetaminophen

Treatment and study plan

Oral acetaminophen

Drug

1000mg oral acetaminophen + 400mg oral celecoxib given within one hour of incision

Other names: Tylenol

Intravenous acetaminophen

Drug

400mg oral celecoxib given within one hour of incision + 1000mg IV acetaminophen within one hour prior to anesthetic emergence.

Other names: Tylenol

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score on the Scale of 10 (0=No Pain and 10=Worst Pain)

    Time frame: 1-h postoperatively

    Pain score on the scale of 10 at 1-h postoperatively in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Morphine Equivalents of Postoperative Opioid Usage

    Time frame: an expected average of 6 hours

    Total amount of postoperative opioid usage at Postoperative Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), an expected average of 6 hours

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Comparative Efficacy of Oral vs. Intravenous Acetaminophen in Sinus Surgery Patients

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2018
First posted
Dec 31, 2015
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.