Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07297043
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Er:YAG laser in the removal of impacted mandibular third molars compared to the conventional surgical technique. The study assesses surgical efficiency, postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and overall patient recovery. The goal is to determine whether the Er:YAG laser provides a safer and less traumatic alternative to traditional bone-cutting methods during third molar surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt
Impacted mandibular third molars are among the most commonly extracted teeth, and conventional surgical removal often involves bone cutting using rotary instruments, which may increase postoperative morbidity. Laser-assisted surgery, particularly using the Er:YAG laser, has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative with potential benefits such as reduced thermal damage, improved healing, and less postoperative discomfort.
This study compares Er:YAG laser-assisted bone removal with the conventional bur technique in terms of operative time, intraoperative ease, and postoperative outcomes including pain, edema, and trismus. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria are randomly allocated into two groups: a laser-assisted surgery group and a conventional surgery group. Standardized measurements and follow-up assessments are conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes and determine the effectiveness and safety of the Er:YAG laser in third molar surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) used for bone cutting during impacted mandibular third molar surgery.
Conventional rotary instruments used for bone removal during surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days
Postoperative pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) at postoperative intervals.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days
Facial swelling will be measured using linear facial measurements (tragus-pogonion and gonion-pogonion distances) preoperatively and at postoperative intervals.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days
Maximum interincisal mouth opening will be measured in millimeters preoperatively and at postoperative intervals to assess trismus.
Time frame: Immediate postoperative, 1 month, and 3 months
Bone density at the extraction site will be assessed using standardized digital radiographs. Gray-scale values will be measured at predetermined reference points to compare bone healing between groups.
Alexandria University
Other
Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07672951
Edema, Edema Face
Islamabad, Federal, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07522918
Edema, Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07604584
Behavior, Facial Swelling
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07600619
Impacted Mandibular Third Molar, Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)
Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
View Trial Details