Smecta
DrugOther names: Diosmectite Beaufour
NCT Number: NCT02704091
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate that diosmectite efficacy is superior to placebo regarding time to recovery of an acute diarrhoea episode presumed of infectious origin in adult subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
CHU Beni Messous, Algiers, Algeria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
related to the acute diarrhoea episode:
Exclusion criteria
related to drugs:
Other digestive exclusion criteria:
Other exclusion criteria:
Other names: Diosmectite Beaufour
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Time to recovery was defined as the time from the first study treatment intake recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF) to the first formed stool followed by a non-watery stool, recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time to recovery, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn without recovery or ending the study without recovery were censored (not responders) at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
The event of diarrhoea onset (i.e. loose or watery stool) was recorded in the eCRF and the event of recovery (i.e. first formed stool followed by a non-watery stool) was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from diarrhoea onset to recovery, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn without recovery or ending the study without recovery were censored (not responders) at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
The event of diarrhoea onset (i.e. loose or watery stool) was recorded in the eCRF and the event of first formed stool was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from diarrhoea onset to first formed stool, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn with no formed stool or ending the study with no formed stool were censored at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
The event of first study treatment intake was recorded in the eCRF and the event of last watery stool was recorded in the DEB. Results are presented as median time from first study treatment intake to last watery stool, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique. Participants prematurely withdrawn with no watery stool or ending the study with no watery stool were censored at the date/time of their last stool as recorded in the DEB. Participants who had not filled in the DEB (i.e. no post-baseline evaluation of stools) were censored at the date/time of their first study treatment intake (or the randomisation date/time if not administered).
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of stools, per 12-hour period, was recorded in the DEB.
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Number of watery stools, per 12-hour period, was recorded in the DEB.
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Percentage of participants with associated symptoms (at least 1 symptom of nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain or anal irritation) per 12-hour period is presented. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and anal irritation were recorded in the DEB.
Time frame: From randomisation (Day 1) up to Day 9
Abdominal pain intensity per 12-hour period was recorded in the DEB. Abdominal pain intensity was rated with a 5-point ordinal scale: 0 = absent, 1= mild, 2 =moderate, 3 = severe, 4= very severe. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The median abdominal pain intensity score for each 12-hour period is presented.
Ipsen
Industry
Efficacy of Diosmectite (Smecta®) in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Diarrhoea in Adults. A Multicentre, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled, Parallel, Groups Study
Acronym: ADIASE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01376440
Acute Diarrhoea
Kersa, Eastern Hararage, Ethiopia
View Trial Details