Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01246453

Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema

1. Objectives:

* Main objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural alteplase vs urokinase in patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. * To evaluate the pleural and plasmatic levels of the fibrinolytic system markers after the treatment with alteplase vs urokinase * To evaluate the safety of alteplase in the treatment of complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema 2. Design: Multicentric, randomized, parallel, controlled and double blind 3. Main variable: Percentage of curation 4. Study population and number of patients: 204 patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema 5. Duration of the treatment: Three days (main variable), and optional three days (secondary variable)

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Empyema and Complex Complicated Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Critically illness
  • Systemic anticoagulant treatment
  • Coagulation Disorder
  • Bronchopleural fistula
  • Active bleeding
  • Recent punction of noncompressive artery
  • Stroke in the last 6 months
  • Major intervention o major traumatism in the last 6 weeks
  • Hypersensibility to urokinase or alteplase
  • Severe Liver or kidney failure
  • Inclusion in another interventional study in the last month

Treatment and study plan

Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Intrapleurally Urokinase

Drug

Alteplase 10 mg and urokinase 100000 intrapleurally administered, once daily for three days and if necessary 6 days

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural alteplase vs urokinase in patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema during one year of follow-up.

    Time frame: Evaluation at three and 6 days of treatment

    It will be also an evaluation at one month, six months and one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the pleural and plasmatic levels of the fibrinolytic system markers after the treatment with alteplase vs urokinase

    Time frame: Evaluation at three and 6 days of treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Pleural Empyema

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Nov 23, 2010
Registry last updated
Jul 18, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.