Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00919763

Efficacy and Safety Study of CD2027 Ointment 3 Microgram Per Gram (mcg/g) Twice Daily Treatment for Adults With at Least Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

This was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Efficacy Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of CD2027 ointment 3 mcg/g applied twice daily over 4 weeks versus its vehicle in adult participants with at least moderate atopic dermatitis.

Safety objective: To evaluate safety of CD2027 ointment 3 mcg/g when applied twice daily over 4 weeks versus its vehicle on 5 percent (%) - 20% involved Body Surface Area (BSA) (excluding Head/Neck) in adult participants with at least moderate atopic dermatitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Burke Pharmaceutical Research, Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participant, 18 years of age or older
  • Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis according to Hanifin and Rajka criteria, of at least moderate intensity according to Investigator Global Assessment (IGA greater or equal to 3)
  • Body surface affected by the disease between 5% and 20% of total BSA, based on Rule of Nine's, excluding Head/Neck
  • At least one area (Target Lesion) which was representative of the participant's disease state, was not located on the hands, feet or genitalia, measures at least 10 cm^2, presented a Total Severity Score of at least 6/15 (total severity score defined as the sum of Erythema, Excoriation, Papulation/Induration, Oozing/Crusting and Lichenification) with oozing/crusting severity at most 1

Exclusion criteria

  • The participant had albumin-adjusted calcium above the upper normal range from screening evaluation
  • The participant had history/signs/symptoms suggestive of an abnormality of calcium homeostasis (such as hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease, adrenal insufficiency, hyperthyroidism)
  • The participant had signs/symptoms of urinary stones or has a history of urinary stones within the past 5 years prior to the Screening Visit

Treatment and study plan

CD2027 Ointment 3 mcg/g, twice daily

Drug

Topical Ointment

Vehicle Ointment, twice daily

Drug

Topical Ointment

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Severity Score (TSS) of Target Lesion at Baseline and Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

    TSS comprised of the sum of an assessment of erythema, excoriation, exudation, lichenification and pruritus, each on a scale of 0 to 3 to give a maximum score of 15; 0 (best) and 3 (worst) indicated total possible minimum score was 0 and total possible maximum score was 15. Lower score meant improvement in condition and higher score indicated worsening of condition.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Total Severity Score (TSS) for Individual Signs at Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

    TSS comprised of the sum of an assessment of erythema, excoriation, exudation, lichenification and pruritus, each on a scale of 0 to 3 to give a maximum score of 15; 0 (best) and 3 (Worst) indicated total possible minimum score was 0 and total possible maximum score was 15. Data for individual signs is reported in this outcome measure. Lower score meant improvement in condition and higher score indicated severity (worsening of condition) for each individual sign.

    Erythema was evaluated on a four point scale of 0 to 3 where (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Excoriation evaluated on a four point scale of 0 to 3 where (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Exudation was evaluated on a four point scale of 0 to 3 where (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Lichenification was evaluated on a four point scale of 0 to 3 where (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Pruritus was evaluated on a four point scale of 0 to 3 where (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe).

  2. Number of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of "0" or "1" and Failure From Baseline of Greater Than 1 Points Over Week 4

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4

    IGA was an assessment scale used to determine severity of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) and clinical response to treatment on a 5-point scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe) based on erythema and papulation/infiltration. Therapeutic response was an IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Participants with IGA score of "0" or "1" and a failure from baseline of greater than (>1) points over 4 weeks were reported.

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Total Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4

    Time frame: Baseline, Week1, Week2, Week 3, Week 4

    The EASI score quantifies the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration, excoriation and lichenification on a scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions was scored on a scale of 0 (no eruption) to 6 (>90%-100% eruption). The total score was the sum of the four body-region scores, maximum=72, minimum=0, Higher scores indicated greater disease severity.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Galderma R&D

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Four-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CD2027 Ointment 3 mcg/g Twice Daily in the Treatment of Adults With at Least Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jun 12, 2009
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.