Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
NCT Number: NCT02119026
Since its introduction, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the cornerstone of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Meanwhile the oral 5FU pro-drug Capecitabine (Xeloda®) proved equivalence to 5-FU and is a well tolerated alternative combination partner for Irinotecan (XELIRI) or Oxaliplatin (XELOX) which are widely used for first line treatment of mCRC. Recent advances in molecular biology have resulted in the development of an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by the monoclonal humanized antibody bevacizumab (Avastin®).
XELOX or XELIRI +bevacizumab have been investigated in several trials, but not in an approach with clearly defined cross-wise XELIRI-XELOX change criteria. This trial investigates two different sequential treatment options with XELIRI/ XELOX in first and second line with the addition of bevacizumab and tries to give answer to the question if there is an optimal sequence for the benefit of the patient.
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, 2-arm pilot trial in patients with mCRC who did not receive systemic treatment for their metastatic disease. The study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of XELIRI followed by XELOX and XELOX followed by XELIRI + bevacizumab in terms of Duration of Disease Control (DDC).
Patients will be treated with an established first line therapy consisting of either XELOX or XELIRI + bevacizumab. The chemotherapy treatment will be given for 6 months except prior disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Bevacizumab will be given until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal.
Capecitabine can be given in addition at the investigators' discretion until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal.
If serious side effects occur despite adequate dose reduction, Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan should be discontinued. In case of Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan-related discontinuation Capecitabine and Bevacizumab should be continued. If Capecitabine also has to be discontinued in first line treatment bevacizumab should be continued. In case of permanent discontinuation of bevacizumab for toxicities, chemotherapy should be continued.
Upon completion of first line chemotherapy patients with disease control will receive bevacizumab maintenance treatment. On investigators decision patients can receive Capecitabine as additional maintenance treatment.
The primary endpoint is to determine the efficacy of a modified XELIRI + bevacizumab followed by XELOX + bevacizumab scheme at progression in comparison with the reverse sequence based on DDC.
Secondary endpoints are first line progression-free survival (PFS), second line PFS, overall response rate, time to response, duration of response, overall survival, tumor assessments (based on RECIST criteria) using CT scans, MRI scans, X-ray, bone scan, clinical examination.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
800mg/m2 bid d1-14
± 1000 mg/m2 bid,days 1-14 q3w: maintenance
Other names: Brand Name: Xeloda
7,5 mg/kg given on d1 q3w
Other names: Brand name: Avastin
130mg/m2 iv. d 1 q3w
200mg/m2 iv. d 1 q3w .
Time frame: screening, every 8 to 9 weeks until progression, at end of treatment (other than progression), every 3 months until progression, death or up to 24 months (whatever comes first)
The primary variable was duration of disease control (DDC) and was defined as the sum of progression free survival intervals during first line and second line treatment (= time from the beginning of first line treatment until onset of progression during second line treatment). Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date).
Time frame: at progression of disease (PD) in first line therapy or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD
The first line PFS was defined as the progression free survival interval during first line treatment. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date). Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced. If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements.
Time frame: at progression of disease (PD) in second line therapy or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD
The second line PFS was defined as the progression free survival interval during second line treatment. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date). Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced.
If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements.
Time frame: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD
The rate of overall response was measured as the response rate from randomization until the day of documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status is recorded first).
Time frame: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD
Time to overall response was measured from the time of randomization until the day of documented complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status is recorded first). Patients without response were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment, the date of death or the date of refusal.
Time frame: at the day of documented complete or partial response or at 28 days safety follow-up in cases without PD
Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria are met for complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (whichever status was recorded first) until the onset of progression. Patients without progression at the last tumor assessment date during their study participation were censored at this last tumor assessment date (exception: availability of validated information about a later onset of progression or a longer progression free interval - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the onset of progression or replaced the last tumor assessment date).
Missing onset of progression data because of refusal or because of death was replaced.
If several response evaluations for a patient showed progressive disease (PD), the time to PD was assessed by using the first of these measurements.
Time frame: date of death or date of last tumor assessment (28d safety f-u) in patients without death
Overall survival was measured as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Patients without death date were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment (exception: availability of validated information about a later exitus date or a prolonged survival - in such a case the date of the follow-up assessment was either defined as the exitus date or replaced the last tumor assessment date) or the date of refusal.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks, 28d Safety follow-up
Best response in first line was based on the tumor assessments (based on RECIST criteria) for target lesions and assessed by CT scans, MRI scans, X-ray, bone scan and clinical examination: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (sum LD) of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started.
Time frame: Baseline, every 8-9 weeks, 28d Safety follow-up
Best response in second line was based on the tumor assessments (based on RECIST criteria) for target lesions and assessed by CT scans, MRI scans, X-ray, bone scan and clinical examination: Complete Response (CR), disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (sum LD) of target lesions; Progressive Disease (PD), >= 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started.
Prof. Dr. Werner Scheithauer
Other
A Phase II Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Capecitabine and Irinotecan Plus Bevacizumab Followed by Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Plus Bevacizumab or the Reverse Sequence in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Acronym: PASSION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05513742
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02821559
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05128032
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05840263
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details