Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05864911

Efficacy and Safety of the Gastric Bypass Stent System on Body Weight and Metabolic Parameters in Obese Patients

In this study, the investigators use a novel endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner-the Gastric Bypass Stent System (Hangzhou Tangji Medical Technology Co., Ltd., China) for the treatment of obesity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new device on weight loss and obesity-associated metabolic parameters.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100050, China

About this study

This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study conducted at the department of gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University in China. In this study, all the participants were implanted with the Gastric Bypass Stent System. The device had an intended implantation time of 12 weeks, and the participants were followed up for 24 weeks. Both the implantation and explantation were conducted under general anesthesia. A liquid diet was required for a week after implantation to reduce the risk of early obstruction or migration. All the participants received an oral proton pump inhibitor twice daily during the implantation and within 4 weeks of removal. Primary outcomes were changes in excess weight loss and total weight loss at 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, liver enzymes, lipids and uric acid at 12 and 24 weeks, and device safety. At the first visit, baseline demographics, medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests were collected. The subjects were scheduled for follow-up visit at 1, 4, 12, 16 and 24 weeks. At each visit, body weight was measured and symptoms were recorded. Blood and fecal samples were collected to observe the changes of metabolic parameters and also to monitor the adverse effects. A complete blood count, liver function, blood glucose, insulin, HbA1C, lipids, uric acid, amylase, iron tests and fecal occult blood were partially or all measured at each visit. Insulin resistance was assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), a value ≧2.69 was considered as insulin resistance. Elevated ALT or AST was considered as abnormal liver enzymes. Primary outcomes were changes in EWL and TWL at 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, BMI, insulin resistance, liver enzymes, lipids, UA at 12 and 24 weeks, and device safety.Analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corporation , Armonk, NY). Data was reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD) . A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses of body weight changes between different time points were conducted with a paired sample t test. Analyses of metabolic parameters in the blood were calculated by generalized estimating equations (GEE) because of the existence of missing values.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 and ≤60 years;
  • Body mass index ( BMI) ≥30 kg/m2;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists( ASA) Physical Status Classification System:I-II.

Exclusion criteria

  • Weight loss of more than 4.5 kg in the past three months, or taking weight-lowering drugs in the past month;
  • Taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulant therapy in the past month;
  • Previous diagnosis with type 1 diabetes mellitus;
  • Loss of islet β-cell function, C-peptide ≤ 1/2 of the normal low limit, or low C-peptide release curve under glucose load;
  • Iron deficiency or iron deficiency anemia;
  • Severe organ dysfunction of the heart, the lung, the liver or the kidney;
  • Patients who have undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or have a history of cholecystitis, gallstones with clinical symptoms or stones larger than 20 mm in diameter; pancreatitis or hepatic abscess;
  • History of duodenal ulcer or gastric ulcer;
  • Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding or potential bleeding;
  • Digestive tract malformation, such as digestive tract atresia or previous gastrointestinal surgery that could cause failure of implantation or affect functioning of the device;
  • History of intestinal obstruction in the past year;
  • Thyroid dysfunction;
  • History of systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma;
  • Pregnant women or women desiring pregnancy in the next few months.

Treatment and study plan

the Gastric Bypass Stent System

Device

The Gastric Bypass Stent System is a newly designed endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of obesity by Hangzhou Tangji Medical Technology Co., Ltd.. It consists of three main parts: a 60-cm polyethylene sleeve fixed into the duodenal bulb by anchors with barbs, a delivery system and a retrieval system. Compared to the Endobarrier, it has several technical adjustments. First, it improved sleeve materials to provide better barrier properties and reduce the breeding of bacteria resulting in hepatic abscess. Second, the barbs on the anchoring system have been modified to reduce duodenal injury. Third, the delivery and retrieval system have been optimized to eliminate the need of fluoroscopic guidance during implantation and explantation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline excess weight loss at 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    excess weight loss change

  2. Change from baseline excess weight loss at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    excess weight loss change

  3. Change from baseline excess weight loss at 24 weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    excess weight loss change

  4. Change from baseline total weight loss at 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    total weight loss change

  5. Change from baseline total weight loss at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    total weight loss change

  6. Change from baseline total weight loss at 24 weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    total weight loss change

  7. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

    Time frame: within 24 weeks

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events to assess device safety

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline body weight at 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    body weight change

  2. Change from baseline body weight at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    body weight change

  3. Change from baseline body weight at 24 weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    body weight change

  4. Change from baseline body mass index at 4 weeks

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    body mass index change

  5. Change from baseline body mass index at 12 weeks

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    body mass index change

  6. Change from baseline body mass index at 24 weeks

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    body mass index change

  7. Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by [fasting insulin level (uU/mL)]×[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)]/22.5

  8. Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by [fasting insulin level (uU/mL)]×[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)]/22.5

  9. Value change of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance were calculated by [fasting insulin level (uU/mL)]×[fasting glucose level (mmol/L)]/22.5

  10. Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of alanine aminotransferase

  11. Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of alanine aminotransferase

  12. Value change of alanine aminotransferase at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of alanine aminotransferase

  13. Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of aspartate aminotransferase

  14. Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of aspartate aminotransferase

  15. Value change of aspartate aminotransferase at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of aspartate aminotransferase

  16. Value change of total cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of total cholesterol

  17. Value change of total cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of total cholesterol

  18. Value change of total cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of total cholesterol

  19. Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol

  20. Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol

  21. Value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of low density lipoprotein cholesterol

  22. Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol

  23. Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol

  24. Value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of high density lipoprotein cholesterol

  25. Value change of triglyceride at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of triglyceride

  26. Value change of triglyceride at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of triglyceride

  27. Value change of triglyceride at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of triglyceride

  28. Value change of blood uric acid at 4 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 4 weeks

    value change of blood uric acid

  29. Value change of blood uric acid at 12 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    value change of blood uric acid

  30. Value change of blood uric acid at 24 weeks compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    value change of blood uric acid

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Hangzhou Tangji Medical Technology Co., Ltd.

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
May 18, 2023
Registry last updated
May 18, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.