NCT Number: NCT00553605
This is a multicenter, randomized, double blind, double dummy, comparative, active-controlled trial designed to assess the analgesic activity and safety of intravenous doses of parecoxib 40 mg relative to intravenous doses of ketoprofen 100 mg for the treatment of renal colic in outpatients presenting at emergency room settings. This trial is designed to show non-inferiority of parecoxib related to ketoprofen.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Pfizer Investigational Site, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ketoprofen 100 mg diluted in 100 ml of normal sodium chloride solution into the established patient's IV line by slow injection in a 20-minute period; and IV dose of 2 ml of normal sodium chloride solution as placebo for Parecoxib by bolus injection
Parecoxib 40 mg diluted in 2 ml of normal sodium chloride solution administered by bolus injection; and an IV dose of 100 ml of normal sodium chloride solution as placebo for ketoprofen administered in a in a 20-minute period
Time frame: Minute 30
mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 30 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 30 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.
Time frame: Minute 120
mPID score was obtained by summation of product of length of the interval and difference in pain intensity (PI) divided by summation of length of the interval. Summation was done from zero to 120 minutes. Difference in pain intensity was obtained by subtracting the Pain Intensity Visual Analogue Scale (PI-VAS) at Minute 120 from baseline PI-VAS score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 millimeter (mm) line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. mPID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120
PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Minute 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120
PID score was obtained by subtracting the PI-VAS at each time point from baseline PI score. PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. PID score ranged from -100 to 100. Positive score= improved response in pain.
Time frame: Baseline through Minute 120
TOTPAR: time-weighted sum of Pain Relief (PR) over 120 min. TOTPAR score range was 0 (worst) to 480 (best). PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0=No relief to 4=Complete relief.
Time frame: Minute 30, 120
PR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale wherein 0= None, 1= a little, 2= Some, 3= a lot and 4= Complete relief.
Time frame: Minute 30
PI-VAS assessed with response to the question "How much pain are you having right now?" on a 100 mm line, with 0 mm=no pain, 100 mm= worst possible pain. Responders were those who had a decreased in VAS of at least 20 mm.
Time frame: Minute 30, 120
Participants' response to the question "How would you rate the study medication you received for pain?" on a 4-point categorical scale, 1=Poor, 2= Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent was evaluated.
Time frame: Minute 30, 120
Physicians' response to the question "How would you rate the study medication the patient received for pain?" on a 4-point categorical scale, 1=Poor, 2= Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent was evaluated.
Time frame: Up to Minute 120
Rescue medications included intravenous 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kilogram (kg) of morphine or 1 mg/kg of pethidine or muscle relaxants.
Pfizer
Industry
A Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Multicenter Study Comparing The Analgesic Efficacy And Safety Of Parecoxib 40mg I.V. To Ketoprofen 100mg I.V. In Renal Colic
Acronym: NAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07025161
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05283980
Acute Pain, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06869369
Behavior, Motor Activity
Kütahya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07729020
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Genoa, Liguria, Italy
View Trial Details