Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04230616

Efficacy and Safety of NAVIO

The goal of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and costs of the NAVIO™ system with the conventional intramedullary alignment guide for total knee replacement in a clinical setting. The hypothesis is that total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the use of NAVIO™ is at least as efficient and safe as TKA with the use of conventional intramedullary alignment guiding.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Orthopaedic Association Sint-Trudo Hospital

Sint-Truiden, Limburg, 3800, Belgium

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Peter Bollars, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+3211334286

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved, as assessed by X-ray
  • High need to obtain pain relief and improve function
  • Above 18 years old
  • Able and willing to follow instructions
  • Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Active infection in knee
  • General infection
  • Failure of previous joint replacement
  • Post-operative or post traumatic malalignment of the knee/leg
  • Pregnancy
  • Not able or willing to undergo CT-scan

Treatment and study plan

Total knee arthroplasty

Procedure

total knee arthroplasty

CT Scan

Radiation

The first 52 participants will recieve a pre- and postoperative CT scan of the hip, knee and ankle.

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in planned and achieved alignment in degrees based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)

    Time frame: within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery

    Difference in preoperatively planned and postoperatively achieved alignment of both the femoral and tibial component of the prosthesis in the frontal, sagittal and coronal plane. Deviations (in degrees varus/valgus, flexion extension, and internal/external rotation) from calculated positions (of both components) to bony anatomic landmarks, used by NAVIO to align the prosthesis, will be obtained.

  2. Difference in planned and achieved mechanical axis in degrees based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)

    Time frame: within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery

    Preoperatively planned and postoperatively achieved mechanical axis of the operated leg. The mechanical axis is defined as the angle between a line from the centre of rotation of the hip to the centre of the femoral component and a line from the centre of the tibial plateau to the centre of the ankle.

  3. Difference in percentage of outliers of alignment on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)

    Time frame: within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery

    Percentage of outliers in alignment (defined as > 3 degrees deviation from positions calculated by software) of the femoral and tibial components in frontal, sagittal and transverse plane.

  4. Difference in percentage of outliers of mechanical axis based on CT scan pre- and postoperatively (first 52 participants)

    Time frame: within 6 weeks pre-surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery

    Percentage of outliers (defined as > 3 degrees deviation from neutral) in mechanical axis of the of the operated leg. The mechanical axis is defined as the angle between a line from the centre of rotation of the hip to the centre of the femoral component and a line from the centre of the tibial plateau to the centre of the ankle.

  5. Mean change in the visual analogue scale scores

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 24 hours post-surgery, day of discharge, 6 weeks post-surgery, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    Comparison is made between the two study arms, a higher visual analogue pain score means a worse outcome

  6. Mean change in the American Knee Society Score

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    in a total of 50 points, stability, 25 points, and range of motion, 25 points. The maximum score of 100 points . Comparison is made between the two study arms. A higher American Knee Society Score means a better outcome

  7. Mean change in the Oxford Knee Score

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    Comparison is made between the two study arms, score between 0 and 48. Better score means better outcome

  8. Mean change in the Lower Extremities Activity scale

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, day of discharge, 6 weeks post-surgery, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    Comparison is made between the two study arms, score between 0 and 80. The minimal clinically important difference is 9 scale points. The lower the score the greater the disability.

  9. Mean change in the The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 3 months post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 2 years post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    Comparison is made between the two study arms. Five items for pain (score range 0-20), two for stiffness (score range 0-8), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-68). The higher the score, the poorer the function

  10. Difference in mechanical axis of the prosthesis between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rays

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    Post-operative (at 6 week visit) the baseline mechanical axis will be measured as the angle between a line connecting the center of the femoral head with the center of the knee and the line connecting the center of the knee with the center of the ankle.

  11. Difference in positioning of the prosthesis between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rays

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    In order to measure positioning of the prosthesis (coronal alignment), long-leg, weight-bearing, standing anteroposterior and lateral X-rays will be made

  12. Difference in wear between the two study arms based on Long-leg X-rays

    Time frame: within 6 weeks preoperative, 6 weeks post-surgery, 1 year post-surgery, 5 years post-surgery, 10 years post-surgery

    In the long term, wear can be roughly measured by measuring again the mechanical axis of the leg and comparing this with baseline mechanical axis and by measuring the distance between medial and lateral femoral condyles and medial and lateral tibial platform respectively.

  13. Significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two study arms

    Time frame: 1 day of discharge from the hospital

    Length of hospital stay (in days) will be registered for both groups.

  14. Operation Time

    Time frame: intraoperative (Time will be recorded from the moment of incision until bandage is being placed)

    Compare the duration of surgery between the two study arms

  15. Significant difference in blood loss between study arms

    Time frame: Intra-operatively until 24 hours post-surgery. .

    Blood loss will be measured intra-operatively and up to 24 hours post-operatively.

    The amount of rinsing liquid will be subtracted from the total amount collected in the suction device to obtain the amount (ml) of intra-operative blood loss. The weight of grids and compresses will be measured post-operatively and dry weight will be subtracted from this value to obtain blood loss not collected in the suction device (1mg = 1ml).

    On day 2 post-operative, Hb and Ht will obtained.

  16. Difference in adverse events

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 years

    Complication registration will be done throughout the entire study period

  17. Difference in frequency of infection

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 years

    When infection is present, this will be noted on the complication registry form and appropriate action will be taken. Distinction will be made between superficial infections and deep infections.

  18. Difference in frequency of trombo-embolic complications

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 years

    Attention will be focused on clinical signs of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

  19. Difference in frequency of wound problems

    Time frame: From day of surgery until 5 days post-surgery

    Persistent wound leakage will be registered. Persistent leakage is defined as leakage lasting 5 days after surgery.

  20. Difference in frequency of loosening

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 10 years.

    Loosening of tibial or femoral components of the prosthesis as seen on X-ray.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Peter Bollars, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+3211 33 42 86

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sint-Trudo Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Alignment of NAVIO Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single Blind Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jan 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.