IV Diclofenac
DrugIV Diclofenac q6h
NCT Number: NCT00507026
This study will compare repeated intermittent IV dosing of diclofenac in patient with moderate to severe post-surgical pain from elective orthopedic surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Helen Keller Hospital, Sheffield, Alabama, United States
The primary objective is to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of three dosage levels of parenteral diclofenac in providing pain relief as compared to placebo or Ketorolac tromethamine.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IV Diclofenac q6h
IV ketorolac q6h
Placebo q6h
Time frame: Over 24 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, pain intensity difference (PID) is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 24 hours ranges from -2400 to 2400. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction.
Time frame: Over 48 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 48 hours ranges from -4800 to 4800. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction.
Time frame: Over 72 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 72 hours ranges from -7200 to 7200. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction.
Time frame: Over 96 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 96 hours ranges from -9600 to 9600. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction.
Time frame: Over 120 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). A positive difference is indicative of improvement. SPIDs was calculated by multiplying the PID score at each post-dose time point by the duration (in hours) since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. SPID over 120 hours ranges from -12000 to 12000. A higher value indicates a better pain reduction.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour), 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes post first dose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on VAS (from 0 mm to 100 mm: 0 = no pain, 100 = worst possible pain). For each post dose time point, PID is derived by subtracting the pain intensity at the post dose time point from the baseline intensity score (baseline score - post-baseline score). PID score range at any post dose (post baseline) evaluation time point was -100 to 100. A positive difference score is indicative of improvement.
Time frame: Baseline (0 hour), 5, 30 minutes post first dose, 1, 24, 48, 72, 90, 120 hours post first dose
Pain intensity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, larger values indicate greater pain intensity. In this outcome measure, percentage of participants attaining >= 30 % reduction in pain intensity from baseline to specified time points was reported.
Time frame: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours post first dose
Pain relief values at specified time points were measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where higher values indicate greater pain relief. TOTPAR over specified time interval was calculated as area under pain relief curve over specified time intervals using trapezoidal approximation. For 0-24 hours score range was 0-2400, for 0-48 hours score range was 0- 4800, for 0-96 hours score range was 0-9600 and for 0-120 hours score range was 0-12000. Higher TOTPAR values indicated more relief.
Time frame: 5, 10, 15, 30, 45 minutes post first dose, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post first dose
Pain relief values at specified time points were measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where higher values indicate greater pain relief.
Time frame: Maximum up to 5 days
Time from administration of study drug to administration of rescue medication were censored at time of last pain assessment for participants who did not receive rescue medication. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine.
Time frame: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours
In this outcome measure, cumulative amount of rescue medication used over 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96, and 0-120 hours were reported. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine.
Time frame: 0-24, 0-48, 0-72, 0-96 and 0-120 hours post first dose
In this outcome measure, number of participants are reported according to number of times they received rescue medication. Rescue medication was additional pain medication, available to participants if they did not receive pain relief from the study drug. Rescue medication available during this study was IV morphine. Only those categories with at least one nonzero value are reported.
Time frame: 0-24, 0-48, 0-120 hours post-dose
Participants global evaluation of study medication was accessed on a scale ranging from scale 0 to 4 where 0= poor, 1= fair, 2= good, 3= very good, 4= excellent where higher score represented better outcome.
Time frame: Within 6 hours of first dose on Day 1
Participants were instructed to stop the first stopwatch at the onset of perceptible pain relief after first dose. Event times of participants not reporting perceptible relief were censored at 6 hours; event times of participants who withdrew or were administered rescue medication were censored at time of withdrawal or rescue. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for analysis.
Time frame: Within 6 hours of first dose on Day 1
Participants were instructed to stop the second stopwatch at the onset of meaningful pain relief after first dose. Event times of participants not reporting meaningful relief were censored at 6 hours; event times of participants who withdrew or were administered rescue medication were censored at time of withdrawal or rescue. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used for analysis.
Pfizer
Industry
Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-and Placebo-Controlled Study of the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Repeated Dosing of DIC075V Versus Parenteral Ketorolac and Placebo in Acute Post-Operative Pain After Elective Orthopedic Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07740252
Hysterectomy, Neurologic Manifestations
Tekirdağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07738861
Mandibular Molar Extraction, Neurologic Manifestations
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06860100
Cardiovascular Diseases, Digestive System Diseases
Van, Tuşba, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07724678
Agnosia, Breast Cancer
Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details