Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05866601

Effects on Anxiety in Physiotherapy Students After Simulation as an Active Method for Learning the Clinical Enterview

The aim of the main study is to find out the effects on anxiety in physiotherapy students after role playing in the learning of the clinical history.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Eva María Martínez-Jiménez, Madrid, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Thirty-one first-year physiotherapy students will carry out the role-playing methodology to learn how to take a clinical history in physiotherapy.

Before and after the realization, they will be measured by means of a validated questionnaire in Spanish, the language in which they study, the variable of anxiety.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women who are studying the first year of Physiotherapy at the Complutense University of Madrid and wish to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Students who do not wish to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Role-playing for learning the clinical interview

Other

Thirty-one first-year physiotherapy students will carry out the role-playing methodology to learn how to take a clinical history in physiotherapy.

Before and after the realization, they will be measured by means of a validated questionnaire in Spanish, the language in which they study, the variable of empathy and anxiety.

Other names: Role-plaiyng

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety Questionnaire called STAI before role playing

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 days

    This questionnaire allows the evaluation of trait anxiety (tendency to perceive stimuli as anxiogenic or not) and state anxiety (degree to which there are anxious elements in the person's environment at the time close to the evaluation). The response scale is Likert-type with 4 alternatives (in the Spanish adaptation from 0 to 3). Both state anxiety and trait anxiety have 20 items for assessment. Thus, the range of responses goes from 0 to 60, with a higher level of anxiety corresponding to a higher score. The Spanish adaptation has adequate psychometric properties. In addition, the scale can be applied in the adolescent population, as well as in university students, with evidence of reliability and validity.

  2. Anxiety Questionnaire called STAI after role playing

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 days

    This questionnaire allows the evaluation of trait anxiety (tendency to perceive stimuli as anxiogenic or not) and state anxiety (degree to which there are anxious elements in the person's environment at the time close to the evaluation). The response scale is Likert-type with 4 alternatives (in the Spanish adaptation from 0 to 3). Both state anxiety and trait anxiety have 20 items for assessment. Thus, the range of responses goes from 0 to 60, with a higher level of anxiety corresponding to a higher score. The Spanish adaptation has adequate psychometric properties. In addition, the scale can be applied in the adolescent population, as well as in university students, with evidence of reliability and validity.

  3. Jefferson scale before role playing

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 days

    To determine the empathy levels of nursing students, the validated Jefferson Empathy Scale for health professions students will be used. This scale consists of 20 items, each of which is assessed using a seven-point Likert-type response scale (from 1 = 'strongly disagree' to 7 = 'strongly agree'). These items are divided into three subscales: 'perspective taking' (11 items), which refers to the cognitive aspects of empathy; 'compassionate care' (6 items), which is characterised by a combination of cognitive and affective aspects of empathy; and 'putting oneself in the patient's shoes' (three items), considered the inverse of emotional distancing . Ten of these items are positively worded, while the other 10 are negatively worded and should be reversed. The total scores range from 20 to 140 points. Higher scores reflect higher levels of empathy.

  4. Jefferson scale after role playing

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 days

    To determine the empathy levels of nursing students, the validated Jefferson Empathy Scale for health professions students will be used. This scale consists of 20 items, each of which is assessed using a seven-point Likert-type response scale (from 1 = 'strongly disagree' to 7 = 'strongly agree'). These items are divided into three subscales: 'perspective taking' (11 items), which refers to the cognitive aspects of empathy; 'compassionate care' (6 items), which is characterised by a combination of cognitive and affective aspects of empathy; and 'putting oneself in the patient's shoes' (three items), considered the inverse of emotional distancing . Ten of these items are positively worded, while the other 10 are negatively worded and should be reversed. The total scores range from 20 to 140 points. Higher scores reflect higher levels of empathy.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayuben Private Clinic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects on Anxiety in Physiotherapy Students After Simulation With Kirkpatric Evaluation as an Active Method for Learning the Clinical Enterview

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
May 19, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.