Kenneth FONG
Hong Kong, 000000
NCT Number: NCT04658745
The study aims to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hong Kong, 000000
Stroke is the leading cause of physical disability. Facilitating the process of motor relearning would greatly accelerate the rehabilitation of motor functions and elicit positive neuroplasticity of the damaged brain area. Previous research has already explored the feasibility of motor priming techniques embedded in stroke rehabilitation programs using strategies such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and mirror therapy (MT). These treatments are usually implemented along with the standardized rehabilitation, sequentially or simultaneously, and have been demonstrated to be more effective than the standardized rehabilitation programs alone.
Mirror neuron, as indicated traditionally by the decrease in the amplitude of Mu rhythm, i.e. a suppression over central electrodes of electroencephalography (EEG), reflects the "seeing" of movement after "perception". Such oscillations are based on neural substrates that are discharged during the observation and execution of a motor act, which is also associated with other human functions, such as imitation, language, etc. The core mirror neuron system (MNS) is thought to be located in the premotor and the primary sensorimotor cortices, indicating that motor learning could be enhanced during action observation and overt movement.
Preliminary research has shown that repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) can enhance the corticomotor excitability in mirror neurons during both observation of movement (by others) or imagined movement in healthy subjects; in particular, as measured by enhanced motor evoked potentials (MEP). Increases in MEP has also been induced by short-term action observation and mirror visual feedback in stroke survivors. However, it is not yet known if MNS can be activated by TMS in MT following a stroke, and the relationship between mirror neuron activation and clinical improvements in stroke remains unclear.
The investigators have already published preliminary findings in patients with hemiplegic upper extremity, rTMS, and MT. Here, the investigators propose to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients, by using a butterfly shape coil.
Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. However, a sham coil will be used, which is not associated with any stimulation effect on the brain.
In sham mirror therapy, the mirror will be covered. Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to move the non-affected hand. The participants cannot receive mirror visual feedback of the paretic upper extremity movement during the therapy. Same as mirror therapy, the movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes.
Time frame: Baseline
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time frame: 1 day
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time frame: 2 weeks
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first session)
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time frame: 1 day
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time frame: 2 weeks
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time frame: 1 day
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time frame: 2 weeks
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1 day
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first session)
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1 day
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 2 weeks
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: Baseline (immediately before the first session)
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1 day
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
Time frame: 1-month after the completion of the intervention
Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07336667
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07685691
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07475598
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ankara, YENIMAHALLE, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07666308
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details