Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04633499

Effects of tDCS on Social Cognition in Aging

The aim of the study is to explore the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on either the right tempo-parietal junction (rTPJ) or the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in healthy older adults (replication in a different sample of a study by Martin et al., 2020).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Medicine Greifswald

Greifswald, 17489, Germany

About this study

Humans are fundamentally social animals. The ability to operate within large social networks requires considerable cognitive capacity, often referred to as social cognition. One social cognitive process thought to involve embodied and nonembodied processes is perspective-taking. Recently, the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) has been suggested as a key hub for embodied processing relevant to social cognition. A study of Martin et al. (2020) could further provide causal evidence that the right temporoparietal junction is involved specifically in the embodied component of perspective-taking. Specifically, HD-tDCS (high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation) to the right temporoparietal junction, but not another hub of the social brain (dorsomedial PFC), increased the effect of body position during perspective-taking, but not tracking. As social cognition is affected by the aging process and decline of socio-cognitive abilities is a key feature of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease, the aim of the present study is to replicate the findings of Martin et al., (2020) in a sample of healthy older adults to better understand the modulation of socio-cognitive processes in older age.

The aim of the study is to explore the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on either the right tempo-parietal junction (rTPJ) or the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) in healthy older adults (replication in a different sample of a study by Martin et al., 2020). 60 healthy older adults and 30 younger participants (serving as a control group) will be tested in a Reading the Eyes in the Mind Task (RMET) and a Task of Visual Perspective Taking (VPT) , while stimulation either the rTPJ or the dmPFC with either active or sham tDCS (stimulation only in the group of older participants). In the RMET the expectation is that older participants have higher reaction times after correct answers under rTPJ tDCS. No stimulation effects of the dmPFC are expected. In the VPT older participants are expected to have a selective effect on body position (similar to the results of Martin et al., 2020) under rTPJ stimulation, but not dmPFC stimulation.

A further focus of the study is how functional and structural connectivity of the brain and individual differences measured with an MRI assessment influence with the success of the RMET and VPT paradigms in an explorative research question.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy older (60 - 80 years) and younger (18 - 30 years) participants
  • German as their main language or sufficient german skills to understand the experiment and the task

Exclusion criteria

  • participants with neuropsychological or psychiatric disease that affect cognition.
  • standard MRI exclusion criteria (e.g. pregnancy, metal implants)
  • standard tDCS exclusion criteria (e.g. metal implants in the head)

Treatment and study plan

Social Cognition Task

Behavioral

Two paradigms will be tested: visual perspective taking and reading the mind in the eyes.

tDCS

Device

tDCS either over the dmPFC or the rTPJ.

Primary outcomes

  1. Response Time in milliseconds in Visual-Perspective Taking Paradigm (VPT) in the active tDCS.

    Time frame: at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)

    The outcome in the VPT paradigm will be response time in milliseconds (for correct answers only).

  2. Response Time in milliseconds in Visual-Perspective Taking Paradigm (VPT) in the sham tDCS.

    Time frame: at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)

    The outcome in the VPT paradigm will be response time in milliseconds (for correct answers only).

  3. Response Time in milliseconds in the Reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET) in the active tDCS.

    Time frame: at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)

    Outcome in the RMET will be reaction times in milliseconds (of correct answers only) in either rTPJ or dmPFC stimulation in comparison to sham stimulation.

  4. Response Time in milliseconds in the Reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET) in the sham tDCS.

    Time frame: at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)

    Outcome in the RMET will be reaction times in milliseconds (of correct answers only) in either rTPJ or dmPFC stimulation in comparison to sham stimulation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional and structural connectivity (via MRI)

    Time frame: MRI Assessment takes places before participants are stimulated with tDCS at Baseline (Day 1).

    It will be investigated how functional and structural connectivity of the brain and individual differences measured with an MRI assessment influence with the success of the RMET and VPT paradigms in an explorative research question.Structural and functional connectivity will be assessed.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medicine Greifswald

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of tDCS on Visual Perspective Taking and Emotion Recognition in Healthy Older Adults

Acronym: SoCoStim

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Nov 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.