Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06333756

Effects of Muscle Strengthening and Fatigue on Activities in Cortex and Muscle

We will explored the effect of cross education training on different cortex functional connectivity, cortex and muscle functional connectivity, and maximal voluntary contraction.

Healthy participants receive cross education training of the elbow flexor (12 rep./set, 3sets, 60%MVC, 180°/s, eccentric).Maximal voluntary contraction, electroencephalogram and electromyogram will record during cross education tasks to determine the effects of cross education training on cortical network and muscle functional connectivity

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

20 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

National Yang-Ming University

Taipei, 112, Taiwan

About this study

Cross education (CE) training was observed in 1894, when unilateral strength training of single limb was found to increase in strength of untrained muscle group. CE has potential clinical relevance in rehabilitation for patient who have acute injuries of the limb, post-surgical limb immobilization and certain neurological disorders with unilateral muscle weakness. Although CE has several potential clinical application, the precise physiological mechanisms underlying CE remains unknown. Previous studies reported that CE may involve bilateral cortical activity in both contralateral primary motor cortex (cM1), and ipsilateral primary motor cortex (iM1).In addition, neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that bilateral supplementary motor area, but CE immediate change of functional connectivity in cortical network remains unknown.

The purposes of this study are to investigate the immediate effect of CE training of biceps brachii (1) Immediate change of functional connectivity in cortical network; (2) Immediate change of functional connectivity in cortex and target muscle; (3) Explore immediate change of corticomuscular functional connectivity on maximal voluntary contraction. We hypothesize that (1) Bilateral cortical motor network that exhibit changes in functional connectivity during cross education; (2) Cross education would immediately enhance functional connectivity between cortex and target muscle; (3) Cross education would immediately change corticomuscular functional connectivity on maximal isometric voluntary contraction.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy adults who are 20-40 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Upper extremity (UE) pain or discomfort
  • Medical condition that substantially influenced their UE strength
  • Experience of UE surgery
  • Paresthesia in UE
  • Open wound on UE

Treatment and study plan

Cross education

Other

Cross education training of the biceps brachii (12 rep./set, 3sets, 60%MVIC,180°/s, eccentric contraction)

Primary outcomes

  1. Corticocortical coherence

    Time frame: Measured immediately after cross education training

    Level of electroencephalography and electromyography synchronization in frequency domain when participants maintain 20% maximal voluntary contraction

  2. Corticomuscular coherence

    Time frame: Measured immediately after cross education training

    Level of electroencephalography and electromyography synchronization in frequency domain when participants maintain 20% maximal voluntary contraction

  3. Maximal voluntary contraction

    Time frame: Measured immediately after cross education training

    The ability to generate maximal voluntary elbow flexor force

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Cross Education Training on Corticocortical and Corticomuscular Functional Connectivity

Acronym: YM110099E

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Mar 27, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.