Brigham Young University
Provo, Utah, 84602, United States
NCT Number: NCT03599115
Overweight and obese individuals will be randomly assigned to a food-specific or generic inhibitory control training. Food intake, weight, and neural indices of inhibitory control will be assessed prior, immediately after the 4-week intervention, and 12-weeks after intervention completion to assess the effectiveness of a mobile inhibitory control training intervention over time for health outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Provo, Utah, 84602, United States
All participants will report to the lab for a baseline session, where their weight, average food intake for three days (using the Automated Self-Administer 24-hour Dietary Recall [ASA24] system), neural indices of inhibitory control (as assessed by the N2 event-related potential component during a food and genetic go/no-go task), appetitive drive toward food (as measured by the Power of Food Scale) and basic demographic information will be assessed. Based off their gender and baseline levels of inhibitory control (indicated by the N2), participants will be assigned to a four week food-specific inhibitory control training or a generic inhibitory control training. Trainings are administered on a mobile device via an app and participants select four our of five business days to complete the trainings on. Immediately after the four weeks, participants will come in for a follow-up session where their weight, food intake, N2, and appetitive drive to food will be assessed again. Finally, participants will have a 12-week waiting period where they do not complete the trainings. After the 12 weeks, they will come in for a final lab visit where their weight, food intake, N2, and appetitive drive to food will be assessed one last time.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Computerized go/no-go task where individuals make responses to certain items (go trials) and withhold responses from certain items (no-go trials, in this case, trials surrounded by a black box). Intervention is designed to target and improve inhibitory control cognitive mechanisms in general (generic arm) or towards high-calorie foods specifically (food arm).
Time frame: Three days will be completed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12 week follow-up visit (total of 9 recalls)
Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Recall (ASA24), participants will record their food intake for two weekdays and one weekend, two of which will be randomly assigned and one which will be the day they report to their lab visit. Caloric intake, as quantified by ASA24, will be averaged for the three days and statistically analyzed to see if average caloric intake changes over time due to the inhibitory control training arm.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up visit.
Weight will be measured in kilograms using a stadiometer to see if weight changes over the course of the study.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up visit.
The N2 is a negative deflection in the event-related potential waveform occurring 200 to 300 ms after the onset of a stimulus and is larger (i.e., more negative) when an individual has to withhold a dominant response. It is a neural reflection of inhibitory control. The investigators will assess if the N2 amplitude gets larger as a result of inhibitory control training (as individuals will be better at recruiting inhibitory control resources). The investigators will also see if the N2 predicts who is successful at losing weight and reducing caloric intake after the intervention, to better understand the mechanism of action for inhibitory control training.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up visit.
Percent of correct no-go trials during the laboratory go/no-go tasks. The investigators are interested if this improves due to the intervention.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up visit.
Time in ms to correctly respond to a go trial during the laboratory tasks. The investigators are interested if reaction times get faster due to the intervention.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at the 12-week follow-up visit.
The PFS assesses thoughts, feelings, and motivations to consume palatable food. It provides a measure of the appetitive drive individuals have to consume food. There are 15 items on the PFS, each ranging from 1 (don't agree at all) to 5 (strongly agree). The PFS is divided into 3 subscales that assess appetitive drive in 3 different environmental situations: when food is available (6 items), when food is physically present (4 items), and when food has been tasted (5 items). Subtotal scores are calculated by taking the mean of all the individual items in each subscale (subscale scores ranging from 1 to 5). An overall score, which is calculated by averaging the three subscale scores, will be used as the outcome of interest (overall score ranging from 1 to 5). A higher overall score on the PFS indicates there is a higher appetitive drive to consume food. The investigators will test if the appetitive drive to consume food changes over time due to the intervention.
Brigham Young University
Other
The Effects of Food-Specific Inhibitory Control Training on Weight, Diet, and Neural Indices in Overweight and Obese Adults
Acronym: N2ICT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06124807
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Chandler, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05981508
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00902694
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06359236
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Eskişehir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details