Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27499, United States
NCT Number: NCT05981508
The purpose of this research study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of an interactive counselor -led online family skills training as part of a behavioral weight loss program for Black Adults.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27499, United States
Nearly half (49.9%) of Black adults in the United States live with obesity. Black adults are underrepresented in standard behavioral weight loss (BWL) interventions and experience sub-optimal weight loss outcomes when included in such programs. Cultural adaptations to BWL interventions that recognize the family behavioral context and address the cultural value of family among Black populations are needed to improve weight loss outcomes. Prior research, including our randomized controlled pilot, Together, Eating and Activity, Matter Plus (TEAM+), have incorporated family skills training to enhance family involvement, targeting cohesion and communication, in addition to core weight loss curriculum. However, family inclusion in weight loss interventions can result in additional barriers to retention and adherence.
Technology has become an attractive delivery format to increase reach to at-risk populations, as a well-designed online program can address issues of timely access and geographical location (or distance from program sites), which are linked to low retention of Black participants. However, technology uptake among Blacks populations still lags due to mistrust, skepticism, concerns about confidentiality, privacy, and remote interaction with staff. Increases in acceptance and utilization of telemedicine and mobile-health were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering the time and location burden already associated with behavioral weight loss sessions, it is important to identify strategies to increase access that are both feasible and acceptable in the target population. Currently the feasibility and acceptability of an online family dyadic skills training is unknown among Black adults.
TEAM+ is an in-person 3-month family enhanced BWL intervention designed for Black adults consisting of a family dyadic skills training and core behavioral weight loss sessions. For this proposed pilot study, 20 black adults interested in weight loss will be recruited with a family member committed to attending both the skills training and core sessions. Participants must 1) be ≥18 years of age, 2) self-identify as Black/African American, 3) reside in the Raleigh/Durham/Chapel Hill area, and 4) have internet access. The core sessions will be delivered in person. To test the feasibility and acceptability of an interactive counselor-led online training, the family dyadic skills training will be delivered online using a web-conferencing platform (e.g., Zoom).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
TEAM+ is a 3-month, family enhanced behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention designed for Black adults consisting of an online family dyadic skills training and in-person core behavioral weight loss sessions.
Other names: TEAM +
TEAM+ is a 3-month, family enhanced behavioral weight loss (BWL) intervention designed for Black adults consisting of in-person family dyadic skills training and core behavioral weight loss sessions.
Other names: TEAM +
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Body weight (kg) expressed as a continuous variable will be collected on a digital scale.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
Body mass index calculated from kg/m^2.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
The Eating Behavior Inventory (EBI) 20 items measures the adoption of eating behaviors associated with weight loss (e.g., monitoring quantity eaten, frequency of weighing, shopping from a list) to measure self-regulation behaviors. Items are rated on a 5-point frequency scale from "never or hardly ever" to "always or almost always." Scores range from 26 to 130. Items are scored such that higher scores indicate eating patterns that are considered more "appropriate" or facilitative of weight control.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
Measured by survey responses to the Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire Short Form (WEL-SF).Scale goes from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (very confident). Higher scores mean better self efficacy. The total score on the WEL-SF ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy in controlling eating behaviors. There are 8 items. This information presented here represents change scores from baseline to post intervention.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
Social Support Effectiveness Survey (25 items) measures partner social support effectiveness. The measure includes items assessing the quantity and quality (e.g., "To what extent did you wish this person's advice or information had been different somehow-for instance, a different type of help, or offered in a different way or at a different time?") on a rating scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely" for 3 types of support (e.g., emotional, informational, and instrumental). The measure also assesses negative byproducts of support provided (e.g., feelings of guilt or indebtedness) using Yes/No options. All responses are numerically transformed. Total scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more effective support.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
The Social Support and Eating Habits Survey (10 items) measures social support specific to healthy eating. Assess encouragement for eating behaviors from partners (e.g., "Encouraged me not to eat 'unhealthy food' when I am tempted") and discouragement for eating behaviors from partners (e.g., "Brought home foods I am trying not to eat"). The items are rated on a scale of "none" to "very often." Total scores range from 5 to 50, with higher scores indicating more social support for eating behaviors.
Time frame: Baseline,12 weeks
The exercise participation subscale of the Social Support and Exercise Survey (10 items) measures social support specific to exercise behaviors assessing the level of support for exercise from partners. Subscale example items include "Exercised with me" and "Criticized or made fun of me for exercising." Total scores range from 5 to 50, with higher scores indicating more social support for exercise participation behaviors.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Family communication is assessed with the communication subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (6 items). Communication is defined as the exchange of information among family members. Items focused on whether verbal messages were clear and direct for the intended recipient. Responses ranged from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." . Uses a 4-point Likert scale for responses, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree", subscale 1-4. Total score range 6-24. Higher scores represent unhealthy communication. Change score from baseline to post intervention presented here.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
The cohesion subscale (10 items) of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III measures the emotional bonding family members have with one another. Items like "Family members ask each other for help" rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "almost never" to "almost always." The score has a range of 10 to 50.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
The family emotional involvement (7 items) of the Family Emotional Involvement and Criticism Scale rate items on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale has a range of 7 to 35. Higher scores on the emotional involvement subscale indicate higher levels of perceived emotional involvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
The perceived criticism (7 items) subscales of the Family Emotional Involvement and Criticism Scale rate items like on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale has a range of 7 to 35. Higher scores on the perceived criticism scale indicate higher levels of perceived emotional involvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
The Family Problem-Solving Communication Index (10 items) was used to measure the specific communication style that families use to manage and solve problems and conflicts in various types of stressful situations. The 2 subscales are combined to report a total score for affirmatory communication and incendiary communication combined, the response options were "false," "mostly false," "mostly true," and "true." Scores range from 10 to 50 and a higher/lower score reflects a worse problem solving skills.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
Feasibility of Conducting an Online Family Dyadic/Couple Skills Training for Black Adults Enrolled in a Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention - Together, Eating and Activity, Matter+ (TEAM+)
Acronym: TEAM+
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06564753
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05394779
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03843424
Adolescent Obesity, Body Weight
Alton, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04874701
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Québec, Canada
View Trial Details