CMHC, Substance Abuse Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
NCT Number: NCT03634839
This study is an examination of the influence of sweet and cooling flavors on the appeal and abuse potential of nicotine-containing e-cigarettes among susceptible youth.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–20 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Researchers will examine the influence of sweet and cooling flavors on the appeal and abuse potential of nicotine-containing e-cigarettes among susceptible youth. Participants will rate the flavor intensity, coolness, sweetness, and irritation experienced using validated rating scales. Forty youth (18-20 years of age) who have experience with e-cigarettes and will participate in 1 laboratory session. They will receive 1 nicotine concentrations (36mg/ml nicotine salt) during the session; during the session they will be exposed, in random order, to sweet (watermelon) and sweet-cooling (watermelon-menthol) flavors combined with the assigned session nicotine concentration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Flavor of e-liquid - sweet or tobacco
Other names: Cooling flavor
Nicotine level (36 mg/ml)
Other names: Nicotine concentration
Time frame: Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
The Labeled Hedonic Scale will be used to ask about liking and wanting of the e-cigarette (one item Visual Analog Scale with ratings ranging from "most disliked sensation imaginable" to "most liked sensation imaginable" with higher values indicating greater liking). Specific scale semantic structure and corresponding values: most disliked imaginable=-100, dislike extremely=-62.9, dislike very much=-41.6, dislike moderately=-17.6, dislike slightly=-5.9, neutral=0, like slightly=6.3, like moderately=17.8, like very much=44.4, like extremely=65.7, most liked imaginable=100.
Time frame: Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Difference between e-cigarette effects for each e-cigarette condition as measured by the computerized version of the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ). Participants will self-report their responses using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. A modified version of the Drug Effects Questionnaire (DEQ) will be used in which participants rate acute responses to the e-cigarette on a 0-100mm scale from "not at all" (0mm) to "extremely" (100mm). Higher values indicate stronger reinforcing efficacy (i.e., wanting/liking effects).
Time frame: At baseline (+0 minutes), Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Difference from baseline in craving for each e-cigarette condition will be measured by the Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Participants will self-report their craving for e-cigarettes using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. The Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scales (gLMS) are category ratio scales with seven semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically as per empirically determined semantic magnitudes on a 0-100 scale (strongest imaginable at the 100 end).
Time frame: Following administration of e-cigarette condition 1 (+10 minutes), following administration of e-cigarette condition 2 (+40)
Difference in irritation at each e-cigarette condition as measured by the computerized Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Participants will self-report their responses using a computer mouse to indicate where on the scale response falls. The Generalized Labeled Magnitude Scales (gLMS) are category ratio scales with seven semantic labels: "no sensation", "barely detectable", "weak", "moderate", "strong", "very strong", and "strongest imaginable", positioned quasi-logarithmically as per empirically determined semantic magnitudes on a 0-100 scale (strongest imaginable at the 100 end).
Yale University
Other
Effects of E-cigarette Flavors on Youth
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03635333
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Mental Disorders
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05897242
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03744559
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Mental Disorders
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03338933
Alcohol Use Disorder, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details