UMass Amherst Henry M. Thomas III Center at Springfield
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Jennifer E Mack, PhD
CONTACT
Jennifer E Mack, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06990997
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether healthy volunteers are more successful at understanding people with aphasia if they have first viewed an aphasia identification (ID) card. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does viewing an aphasia ID card improve healthy volunteers' understanding of the language errors made by people with aphasia? * Does viewing an aphasia ID card improve healthy volunteers' understanding of people with aphasia who make long pauses in their speech?
Researchers will compare aphasia ID cards to a control condition (no ID card) to see whether aphasia ID cards improve healthy volunteers' understanding.
Healthy volunteers will visit the study site for a single session (about 2 hours long). During the session they will:
* Complete brief tests of their vision, hearing and thinking * Listen to sentences produced by a speaker with aphasia while their eye movements are recorded * Complete a survey about the experience of listening to the speaker with aphasia
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–59 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01115, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Jennifer E Mack, PhD
CONTACT
Jennifer E Mack, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
People with aphasia often experience challenges conveying their thoughts to unfamiliar communication partners, which is critical for living independently and building new social connections. This line of research has two long-term objectives: to improve unfamiliar communication partners' comprehension of people with aphasia, and to support people with aphasia in advocating for their communication needs. This project addresses these goals with a focus on service workers, who interact directly with customers to provide goods, services, or information. Being understood by service workers is often necessary to complete essential tasks such as purchasing food and picking up medication. This project investigates whether service workers comprehend speakers with aphasia more accurately when they have first read an aphasia identification (ID) card. Aphasia ID cards contain written self-advocacy statements that disclose the speaker's aphasia, define aphasia, and provide guidance on how to communicate successfully. These statements have been shown to improve unfamiliar communication partners' attitudes (knowledge about aphasia, emotions, and behavior), which improves communication experiences for people with aphasia. This project tests the central hypothesis that, by improving unfamiliar communication partners' attitudes, aphasia ID cards facilitate key language processes that improve their comprehension of people with aphasia. This randomized controlled trial will enroll 160 service workers. Half of the service workers will view an aphasia ID card for a speaker with aphasia, and half will not. Then, all service workers will complete tasks measuring their attitudes, language processing, and comprehension of service requests (i.e., requests for goods, services, or information) produced by speakers with aphasia. Eye-tracking will be used to measure key language processes that take place while service workers listen to the service requests. The Specific Aims are to investigate how viewing an aphasia ID card affects service workers' attitudes, language processing, and comprehension when people with aphasia produce long pauses (Aim 1) and paraphasias (word-retrieval errors) (Aim 2). By rigorously investigating the effects of aphasia ID cards on service workers' attitudes, language processing, and comprehension, this project will contribute to the long-term goals of improving unfamiliar communication partners' comprehension and helping people with aphasia self-advocate effectively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will view an aphasia ID card for a speaker with aphasia. The card will disclose the speaker's aphasia, define aphasia, and request time to communicate.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention
Percent correct mouse-click responses on the Service Request Comprehension Task for sentences with long pauses. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention
Percent correct mouse-click responses on the Service Request Comprehension Task for sentences with paraphasias (word-retrieval errors). The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention
Mean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at task-relevant pictures during long pauses, indicating attention to task. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention
Mean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at the target picture during words immediately following long pauses, indicating linguistic integration of those words. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 5 minutes post-intervention
Mean proportion of time in which the participant gazes at the target picture in the 1000 ms following paraphasias (word-retrieval errors), indicating implicit repair of the speaker's errors. The Service Request Comprehension Task measures participants' comprehension and processing of language produced by a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-intervention
Rating scale, 0-100 scale with question "When listening to the speaker, I felt _____", with endpoints of "impatient" on the zero side and "patient" on the 100 side. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-intervention
Rating scale, 0-100 scale with question "I think that the speaker is _____", with endpoints of "unintelligent" on the zero side and "intelligent" on the 100 side. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.
Time frame: 0 minutes (immediately) post-intervention, 45 minutes post-intervention
Rating scale, 0-100 scale with question "I think that it was _____ for the speaker to find the words for what they wanted to say", with endpoints of "hard" on the zero side and "easy" on the 100 side. Lower scores mean a better outcome. The Attitude Survey measures participants' knowledge, beliefs, and emotions relating to listening to a speaker with aphasia.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Other
Effects of Aphasia Identification Cards on Comprehension of Aphasic Language by Unfamiliar Communication Partners
Acronym: PAUSE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04742894
Aphasia, Communication Disorders
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07688551
Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04375722
Aphasia, Behavior
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05425615
Aphasia, Behavior
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details