tDCS
DeviceThe study intervention will be delivered using the Soterix 1x1 Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medical Inc., New York).
NCT Number: NCT07688551
The purpose of this study is to help us understand if adding transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, to Speech Therapy improves language recovery in people with Broca's aphasia and is more effective than Speech Therapy alone.
Interested in participating?
Request Info25 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
This project is a prospective randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial to compare auditory-visual speech therapy coupled with adjuvant active anodal tDCS (A-tDCS) versus speech therapy coupled with sham tDCS (S-tDCS). The investigators will perform an adaptive Phase II/III design, in which the first portion of the study (Phase II) will determine the optimal dose of A-tDCS (1 mA versus 2 mA) and provide a go/no-go decision for Phase III. The investigators will use a 10-10 system to determine electrode placement, with 5 x 5 cm pads, and stimulation duration will be 20 minutes. Phase III will test the definitive superiority of adjuvant A-tDCS at the optimal dose coupled with speech therapy versus speech therapy alone (S-tDCS) to improve naming among individuals with chronic Broca's aphasia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The study intervention will be delivered using the Soterix 1x1 Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Clinical Trials device (Soterix Medical Inc., New York).
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
Change in the number of correctly named items between the average of the two pre-treatment Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) assessments and the average of the two post-treatment PNT sessions at 4-weeks post treatment.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 1-week post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in improving naming at 1-week post treatment.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 24-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in improving naming at 24-weeks post treatment.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in reducing aphasia severity as measured by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R AQ).
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in improving functional communication.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in improving quality of life as measured by the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39).
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate superiority of active tDCS with speech therapy compared to sham tDCS with speech therapy in improving communication confidence.
Time frame: From baseline assessment to 4-weeks post treatment
To demonstrate safety differences (proportion of new adverse events) between groups.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Julius Fridriksson
CONTACT
Leonardo Bonilha
CONTACT
University of South Carolina
Other
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Treat Aphasia: A Superiority Study
Acronym: STARS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07036406
Anomia, Aphasia
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06829420
Aphasia, Aphasia Non Fluent
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07281313
Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01927302
Agrammatism, Agraphia
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details