Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07280689

Effects of an Aging Simulation Suit on Clinical Empathy in Healthcare Professionals Working in Long-Term Care

This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of using an aging simulation suit on empathy levels among healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities. A total of 82 participants from four nursing homes in Madrid and Asturias were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group received a theoretical session on aging and empathy, followed by an immersive experience using the GERT aging simulation suit, which replicates age-related physical and sensory limitations. The control group attended only the theoretical session.

Empathy was assessed before and after the intervention using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions version (JSPE-HPS). Results showed significant improvements in the JSPE-HPS total score and in its Perspective Taking and Compassionate Care dimensions in the experimental group, indicating that the immersive experience enhanced both cognitive and affective components of clinical empathy. No significant changes were observed in the IRI scores.

These findings suggest that experiential learning through aging simulation can effectively strengthen empathy in active healthcare professionals, promoting more person-centered and compassionate care for older adults in long-term care settings.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922, Spain

About this study

Aging is accompanied by physiological, structural, and psychosocial changes that affect mobility, sensory functions, and interaction with the environment. Healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities play a crucial role in supporting the physical, emotional, and social well-being of older adults. Empathy, understood as the ability to understand and share another person's feelings, is a key component of effective therapeutic relationships and person-centered care.

Traditional empathy training for healthcare providers often relies on lectures, role-playing, or observation of patient interactions. However, there is limited evidence regarding the impact of immersive simulation-based methods on empathy among active healthcare professionals. The use of aging simulation suits, which reproduce the physical and sensory limitations of older adults, has emerged as an innovative educational tool to promote understanding of the aging experience and improve empathic attitudes toward older persons.

This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effect of an aging simulation suit (GERT, Niederstotzingen, Germany) on levels of clinical empathy among healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:

Experimental Group: Received a theoretical educational session on aging, functional limitations, and the role of empathy in care, followed by a practical session using the aging simulation suit. During the simulation, participants performed daily living tasks (e.g., walking, climbing stairs, dressing, interacting with others) while experiencing the physical restrictions associated with advanced age.

Control Group: Received only the theoretical session on aging and empathy without the immersive simulation experience.

Empathy was assessed pre- and post-intervention using two validated instruments:

Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) - measures cognitive and emotional dimensions of general empathy.

Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions version (JSPE-HPS) - evaluates empathy specifically in clinical contexts.

Data analysis was conducted using repeated-measures ANOVA to assess within- and between-group differences over time.

Main findings: The experimental group showed significant increases in total JSPE-HPS scores and in the subscales Perspective Taking and Compassionate Care, whereas the control group showed no significant changes. No significant differences were observed in IRI scores. These results indicate that immersive experiential learning through the use of an aging simulation suit can enhance both cognitive and affective aspects of empathy in healthcare professionals.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidad Rey Juan Carlos and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

This research supports the integration of simulation-based empathy training in continuing professional education for healthcare workers in long-term care, promoting more compassionate, person-centered care for the aging population.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthcare professional (nurse, nursing assistant, occupational therapist, physiotherapist, physician, psychologist, or social worker).
  • Currently working in a long-term care or nursing home facility with direct contact with residents.
  • Willing to participate voluntarily during working hours.
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Failure to provide written informed consent.
  • No direct patient contact with older adults.
  • Any physical or cognitive limitation that would prevent safe participation in the aging simulation experience.

Treatment and study plan

Experimental: Aging Simulation Suit + Educational Session

Behavioral

Immersive training session using the GERT aging simulation suit (Niederstotzingen, Germany), designed to reproduce age-related physical and sensory limitations. Participants performed common daily activities (e.g., walking, climbing stairs, dressing, interacting with others) while wearing the suit to experience the physical challenges of aging. This activity was followed by a short debriefing and group reflection aimed at enhancing empathy and awareness toward older adults.

Control: Educational Session Only

Behavioral

A structured theoretical session covering topics such as aging processes, functional limitations, and the importance of empathy in healthcare and long-term care contexts. Delivered to all participants in both study arms, serving as the baseline educational component for the control and experimental groups.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in total score on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions version (JSPE-HPS)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention (baseline) and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean difference in total Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy - Health Professional Student version (JSPE-HPS) score between baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention for each study group. The JSPE-HPS measures clinical empathy in healthcare professionals and consists of 20 items, with total scores ranging from 20 to 140; higher scores indicate higher empathy (better outcome). The primary analysis was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine time effects and the group × time interaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Perspective Taking subscale of the JSPE-HPS

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean pre/post difference in the Perspective Taking subscale of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy - Health Professional Student version (JSPE-HPS). The JSPE-HPS consists of 20 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale (total score range 20-140). The Perspective Taking subscale comprises 10 items, with subscale scores ranging from 10 to 70. This subscale assesses cognitive empathy, and higher scores indicate higher levels of empathy (better outcome). Differences were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, including the group × time interaction.

  2. Change in Compassionate Care subscale of the JSPE-HPS

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean pre/post difference in the Compassionate Care subscale of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy - Health Professional Student version (JSPE-HPS). This subscale assesses affective aspects of clinical empathy, with higher scores indicating higher empathy (better outcome). Differences were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, including the group × time interaction.

  3. Change in Standing in the Patient's Shoes subscale of the JSPE-HPS

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean pre/post difference in the Standing in the Patient's Shoes subscale of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy - Health Professional Student version (JSPE-HPS). This subscale assesses the ability to adopt the patient's perspective, with higher scores indicating higher empathy (better outcome). Differences were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, including the group × time interaction.

  4. Change in total score on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean difference in total Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) score between pre- and post-intervention. The IRI is a 28-item measure distributed across four subscales (Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, and Personal Distress), with total scores ranging from 0 to 112. Higher total scores indicate greater empathic disposition. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA to evaluate time effects and the group × time interaction.

  5. Change in IRI subscale scores (Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, Personal Distress)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)

    Mean pre/post difference in each of the four Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) subscales (Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, and Personal Distress), each consisting of 7 items with scores ranging from 0 to 28. For Perspective Taking, Fantasy, and Empathic Concern, higher scores indicate greater empathy (better outcome), whereas for Personal Distress, higher scores indicate greater self-oriented distress (worse outcome). Each subscale was analyzed separately using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine time effects and the group × time interaction.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Other

Collaborators

  • Participating Nursing Homes in Madrid and Asturias, Spain

Registry information

Official study title

Mejorar la empatía Hacia el Mayor Mediante la simulación de la Vejez

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 12, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.