Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Zuoying District, 813414, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT06946888
This measurement aims to understand the effect of self-acupressure on the Shenmen Point (神門) and (內關) points on the hand on emotional distress, anxiety, depression, stress, work fatigue and adaptability of clinical nurses. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Whether acupressure can reduce emotional distress, anxiety, depression, stress and work fatigue in nursing staff.
Participants will:
1. Enforcement measures:
1. Acupressure group: Perform self-acupressure twice a day, each time for about 2 minutes, and record the acupressure records every day for 2 consecutive weeks. 2. Original method group: followed the original self-coping method. 2. After the intervention began, participants completed study questionnaires weekly for two months.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kaohsiung City, Zuoying District, 813414, Taiwan
The goal of this study is to understand emotional distress, anxiety, depression, stress, workplace fatigue, and resilience among clinical nurses, as well as the factors related to these conditions. Investigators also want to evaluate the effects of different coping methods-either by self-pressing specific acupuncture points (Shenmen and Neiguan on the hand) or using usual ways of managing stress and anxiety.
Participants can join this study if:
Participants cannot join this study if:
If participants agree to participate and sign the consent form, researchers will ask participants to fill out several questionnaires. These will cover basic info, emotional distress, mood, depression, anxiety, work stress, fatigue, and resilience. It takes about 10-20 minutes to complete.
If participants distress score is 3 or higher, or your mood score is 4 or higher, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Investigators will check in with participants every week using the same set of questionnaires to track changes for two months. In total, participants will be asked to fill out the survey 9 times.
Past research and traditional practice have shown that pressing the Shenmen and Neiguan points can help reduce anxiety, stress, insomnia, and related symptoms. While the researchers cannot guarantee that this study will help individual participants, it may help healthcare professionals understand ways to better support caregivers and could benefit others in the future.
Researchers will only collect information necessary for this study. All personal data and survey responses of participants will remain confidential. The researcher will not use the participant's name or personal identification, but will assign a code to the participant so that the participant's identity remains anonymous in all records.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants in this group will receive instruction on how to perform self-acupressure targeting two specific acupoints on the hands: Shenmen and Neiguan. The acupressure protocol includes pressing each acupoint approximately 15 times (about 30 seconds), with a total of four acupoints per session (both hands), for approximately 2 minutes per session. Pressure should be applied until a sensation of soreness, numbness, fullness, or slight pain is felt (equivalent to about 3 kg of pressure). Participants are asked to perform self-acupressure twice daily (once in the afternoon and once before bedtime, adjustable based on personal schedule) for a total of 2 weeks. They will record their practice using a daily log and continue to complete psychological and emotional outcome questionnaires weekly over a 2-month follow-up period.
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Taiwanese Depression Scale, which has demonstrated strong psychometric properties in Taiwanese populations. The TDS consists of 18 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 = none or seldom (less than one day per week), 1 = sometimes (one to two days per week), 2 = often (three to four days per week), and 3 = almost always (five to seven days per week). Total scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms.
The results from Lee et al. (2000) demonstrated that the TDS had excellent reliability and validity. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.90, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.92. The TDS also showed good concurrent validity, with a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.92 at a cutoff score of 19.
In the present study, the TDS demonstrated excellent internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of .94.
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Psychological distress was measured using the Brief Symptom Rating Scale-5 (BSRS-5), a validated screening tool for general psychological distress. The BSRS-5 assesses the subjective severity of the following symptoms: (1) anxiety, (2) depression, (3) hostility, (4) low self-esteem, and (5) insomnia. Each symptom was scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 20 points. Higher scores indicate more severe psychological distress.
Studies have shown that a total score of 3-4 is the optimal threshold for identifying clinically relevant distress based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The BSRS-5 showed high accuracy (AUC = 0.92) and good sensitivity (0.83) and specificity (0.86). Therefore, this study used a BSRS-5 total score ≥4 as one of the inclusion criteria to ensure that participants with at least mild psychological distress were included in the study.
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
This scale assesses an individual's ability to adapt and recover from stress and adversity. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"), with a total score ranging from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Initial validation studies demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including good model fit in confirmatory factor analysis (GFI = 0.973) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .91).
All instruments used in this study were authorized by their original developers and have been psychometrically validated in previous studies. All scales demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach's α values ranging from 0.84 to 0.95.
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Anxiety levels were assessed using the state subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S). Studies have confirmed the multidimensional factor structure of the Chinese version of the scale and demonstrated good psychometric properties, including adequate convergent and discriminant validity. In this sample, the STAI-S demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .95). The STAI-S consists of 20 items that assess anxiety-related feelings, thoughts, and behaviors at the time of assessment. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much"). Items 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19, and 20 are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 20 to 80, with scores between 20 and 39 indicating mild anxiety, 40 to 59 indicating moderate anxiety, and 60 to 80 indicating severe anxiety.
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Perceived job stress was measured using the 14-item Work Pressure Inventory developed by Huang et al. (2017), which has demonstrated good internal consistency. The scale comprises three dimensions: low self-development, workload, and job characteristics. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 5 ("strongly agree"), with total scores ranging from 14 to 70. Higher scores indicate greater perceived occupational stress. In the original validation study, the Cronbach's α coefficients for the three subscales were 0.81, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively. In the present study, the Work Pressure Inventory showed good overall internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .84).
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Occupational burnout was assessed using the Chinese version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), which has demonstrated good psychometric properties in Taiwanese populations. The scale consists of four subscales: personal burnout, work-related burnout, client-related burnout, and overcommitment to work. Each item is rated on a five-point frequency scale: "always" (100), "often" (75), "sometimes" (50), "rarely" (25), and "never" (0). Subscale scores are calculated as the average of the items within each domain, ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe occupational burnout. The original validation study reported Cronbach's α values above 0.84 across all subscales. In the present study, the scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .95).
Time frame: At baseline(weeks 0) and once weekly for 8 weeks(weeks 1-8)
Emotional distress was measured using the Distress Thermometer (DT), a single self-report screening instrument with a score range of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress), with higher scores indicating greater emotional distress. The DT demonstrated good psychometric properties in validation studies, with sensitivities ranging from 0.50 to 1.00 (median = 0.83) and specificities ranging from 0.36 to 0.98 (median = 0.68).
This study used a DT cutoff score of ≥3 as the inclusion criterion. Other studies have shown that the optimal DT cutoff score varies across settings, typically ranging from 3 to 5, while thresholds of ≥4 or ≥5 are commonly used in clinical practice. The use of a score of ≥3 in this study was intended to maximize sensitivity and minimize the risk of underidentifying caregivers considered at high risk for psychological distress.
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Other
Effects of Acupressure on Nurses' Psychological Distress, Anxiety, Depression, Job Stress, Occupational Burnout, and Resilience
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04680611
Adjustment, Adjustment, Emotional
Aberdeen, Grampian, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT04913766
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04785677
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07157241
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Mecca, Saudi Arabia
View Trial Details