Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05809310

Effects Branch PA Stenting d-TGA, ToF and TA

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to identify the effects of percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis on exercise capacity in patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

The primary study objective is to identify the effects of percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis on exercise capacity in patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA. The secondary objectives are 1) to assess the effects of percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis on RV function and 2) to define early markers for RV function and adaptation to improve timing of these interventions.

Participants will undergo the same series of examinations at baseline and approximately 6 months follow-up (within 6 week time-range) as part of standard care: conventional transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and conventional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) including a low dose dobutamine stress MRI to assess RV functional reserve. The low dose dobutamine stress MRI will be performed in the interventional group from the UMC Utrecht/WKZ and Erasmus MC because the LUMC and AUMC do not have a suitable infrastructure for the low dose dobutamine stress MRI and this cannot be achieved throughout the duration of this study. The baseline CMR in the interventional group will be performed as close as possible prior to the intervention but maximal 4 weeks prior to the intervention. In addition, the intervention group will undergo standard RV pressure measurements during the intervention. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires will be obtained at baseline and 2 weeks post intervention (intervention group) or a similar time range in the control group, which is based on experts opinion. TTE, CPET and conventional CMR will be performed within 2-4 years follow-up to assess the long-term effects of percutaneous PA interventions.

Researchers will compare the difference in VO2 max (% predicted) between the interventional group (TGA, ToF or TA patients with a class II indication for a PA intervention who will undergo a percutaneous intervention for a PA stenosis) and the control group (TGA, ToF or TA patients with a class II indication for a PA intervention who will undergo conservative management)

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

About this study

Rationale: Postoperative survival of patients with dextro transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA), Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) and Truncus Arteriosus (TA) has increased over the last decades due to advances in operative techniques and perioperative care. Despite postoperative survival has increased, morbidity of these patients increases during long-term follow-up with a high need for reinterventions. Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) obstructions are the most common indication for a reintervention and percutaneous branch pulmonary artery (PA) interventions account for a significant number of these reinterventions. However, the effects of percutaneous branch PA interventions on exercise capacity, RV function and RV adaptation of patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA remains largely unknown. In addition, there is no consensus about the optimal timing for percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis in international guidelines.

Objective: The primary study objective is to identify the effects of percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis on exercise capacity in patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA. The secondary objectives are 1) to assess the effects of percutaneous interventions for branch PA stenosis on RV function and 2) to define early markers for RV function and adaptation to improve timing of these interventions.

Study design: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients will be included from the following Dutch interventional centers for congenital heart disease: UMC Utrecht/WKZ (sponsor), LUMC/AUMC and Erasmus MC. During this trial there will be two groups: 1. a group of patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA who will undergo a percutaneous intervention for a branch PA stenosis according to standard care (intervention group) and 2. a group of patients with d-TGA, ToF and TA with a similar degree of pulmonary stenosis as group 1 (class IIa indication) who will undergo conservative management for a branch PA stenosis according to standard care (control group). If necessary, the control group will be able to undergo a percutaneous intervention for branch PA stenosis after the examinations at approximately 6 months follow-up, or sooner in case of symptoms. Patients from both groups will undergo the same series of examinations at baseline and approximately 6 months follow-up (within 6 week time-range) as part of standard care: conventional transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and conventional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) including a low dose dobutamine stress MRI to assess RV functional reserve. The low dose dobutamine stress MRI will be performed in the interventional group from the UMC Utrecht/WKZ and Erasmus MC because the LUMC and AUMC do not have a suitable infrastructure for the low dose dobutamine stress MRI and this cannot be achieved throughout the duration of this study. The baseline CMR in the interventional group will be performed as close as possible prior to the intervention but maximal 4 weeks prior to the intervention. In addition, the intervention group will undergo standard RV pressure measurements during the intervention. Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires will be obtained at baseline and 2 weeks post intervention (intervention group) or a similar time range in the control group, which is based on experts opinion. TTE, CPET and conventional CMR will be performed within 2-4 years follow-up to assess the long-term effects of percutaneous PA interventions.

Study population: d-TGA post ASO, ToF or TA patients ≥8 years old will be included if they have a class IIa indication for a percutaneous intervention for branch PA stenosis according to the international guidelines. Patients will be excluded if they contraindications for one of the examinations.

Main study parameters/endpoints: the difference in VO2 max (% predicted) as parameter for exercise capacity between the interventional and control group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Patients with d-TGA post ASO, ToF or TA
  • ≥8 years

Exclusion criteria

One or more of the following inclusion criteria:

  • All class IIa indications for a branch PA intervention:
  • Persistent decreased RV function (based on gold standard CMR)
  • <18 years RVEF ≤55% (28)
  • ≥18 years RVEF<50% (29)
  • Progressive tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (≥moderate)
  • Isolated bifurcation stenosis:
  • Significant unilateral stenosis (≥50%)
  • Borderline bilateral PA stenosis (40-70%)
  • Unbalanced perfusion (≤35/65%)
  • RV/LV pressure ratio > 2/3 based on echocardiography
  • Reduced lung perfusion or decreased objective exercise capacity (based of gold standard VO2 max during CPET)
  • <18 years VO2 peak <35 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 (boys) VO2 peak <30 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 (girls) (30)
  • ≥18 years VO2 peak <27 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 (men) VO2 peak <19 mL∙kg-1∙min-1 (women) (31)

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous intervention (stent) for PA stenosis

Procedure

Percutaneous intervention (stent placement) in one or both of the branch pulmonary arteries

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline VO2max as percentage of predicted at 6 months as indication of exercise capacity

    Time frame: change between baseline and 6 months follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

Secondary outcomes

  1. Technical success using invasive right ventricular and pulmonary artery pressures and gradients

    Time frame: after the intervention, an average of 1 month after baseline

    Technical success of the intervention using invasive right ventricular and pulmonary artery pressures and gradients

  2. Peak workload (W)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

  3. Peak workload (% predicted)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

  4. O2 pulse (ml)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

  5. O2 pulse (% predicted)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

  6. VE/VCO2 slope

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using cardiopulmonary exercise test on a treadmill

  7. Right ventricular ejection fraction (%)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using CMR

  8. RV strain (%)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using speckle tracking echocardiography and CMR feature tracking

  9. RV fractional area change (%)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using echocardiography

  10. RV pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using echocardiography (TI gradient)

  11. RV end-systolic elastance

    Time frame: before and after the intervention, an average of 1 month after baseline

    using pressure-volume analysis

  12. RV end systolic volume (ml and ml/m2)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using CMR

  13. RV end diastolic volume (ml and ml/m2)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using CMR

  14. RV functional reserve

    Time frame: at baseline and 6 months follow-up in the interventional group from UMC Utrecht and Erasmus MC

    RVEF dobutamine - RVEF rest using a low dose dobutamine stress MRI

  15. RV mass (g and g/m2)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using CMR

  16. Right ventricular pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling

    Time frame: before and after the intervention, an average of 1 month after baseline

    using pressure-volume analysis

  17. Lung perfusion (%)

    Time frame: at baseline, 6 months follow-up and 2-4 years follow-up

    using CMR

  18. Quality of Life (QoL) in 4 domains: health and related activities, emotional, social and school/work

    Time frame: at baseline and 2 weeks follow-up

    using PedsQL questionnaire

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hans Breur, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 88 75 754 59

Renée Joosen, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht

Other

Collaborators

  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC), Location Academic Medical Center (AMC)
  • Dutch Heart Foundation
  • Erasmus Medical Center
  • Hartekind
  • Leiden University Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Branch Pulmonary Artery Stenting in d-TGA, ToF and TA: a Randomized Control Trial

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
Registry last updated
Mar 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.