Effectiveness of Ventilation Modes in Intensive Care: A Comparison of Mandatory Minute Ventilation and Synchronized Intermittant Mandatory Ventilation Using Bioelectrical Impedance Tomography

Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) and Mandatory Minute Ventilation (MMV) are two established modes of mechanical ventilation commonly used in intensive care settings. SIMV delivers a fixed number of breaths with preset tidal volume or pressure, while allowing the patient to breathe spontaneously between mandatory breaths, enhancing patient-ventilator synchrony. MMV combines features of SIMV and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), ensuring a target minute ventilation by supplementing spontaneous efforts when necessary.

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging modality that provides real-time monitoring of regional lung ventilation and perfusion through surface electrodes. EIT has been validated against conventional imaging and monitoring methods including computed tomography, nitrogen washout, PET, and SPECT. It enables continuous bedside evaluation of ventilation distribution, making it particularly useful for guiding mechanical ventilation strategies in critically ill patients.

This prospective, single-center, crossover study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and physiological impact of MMV compared to SIMV in adult ICU patients who are hemodynamically stable but require mechanical ventilation due to various non-neuromuscular reasons. Inclusion criteria require patients to be over 18 years old, not on vasopressor therapy, with FiO₂ ≤ 60%, and without the need for high PEEP (>8 cmH₂O) or neuromuscular blockade.

Each patient will be ventilated with both SIMV and MMV modes for 12 hours each, with the order of modes randomized using a crossover design. To eliminate carry-over effects, a one-hour washout period will be implemented between mode transitions. During each ventilation mode, EIT will be used to assess real-time regional ventilation distribution. Additionally, gas exchange parameters including PO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, and EtCO₂ will be recorded. The primary objective is to determine whether MMV offers comparable or superior ventilation distribution and gas exchange compared to SIMV in this specific patient population.

Inclusion criteria

• Age ≥ 18 years

Intubated and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Hemodynamically stable (no vasopressor support)

FiO₂ ≤ 60%

PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O

Not receiving neuromuscular blocking agents

Able to tolerate switching between SIMV and MMV modes

Exclusion criteria

Pregnant or breastfeeding patients

Patients with neuromuscular diseases affecting respiratory drive

Unstable hemodynamics or ongoing need for vasopressors

Patients requiring high PEEP (>8 cmH₂O)

Patients with DNR (do not resuscitate) status

Participation in another interventional study

-