Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04168476

Effectiveness of Scapula Mobilization on Mechanosensitivity of Upper Limb Neural Test 1 in Mechanical Neck Pain

Between 45% and 70% of the general population suffers neck pain at some point in their lives, making it one of the most frequent reasons for taking sick leave. Given its importance in physiotherapy at clinical level, we seek to observe how a scapular mobilization technique might influence the neural mechanosensitivity of the median nerve as measured by Upper Limb Neural Test 1 (ULNT1) on subjects with neck pain.

Hypotheses and objectives. Performing a scapular mobilization technique on subjects with neck pain and a positive ULNT1 improves the patient's response to said test. It also decreases the patient's neck pain as measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and increases grip strength.

Material and method. A single-blind clinical trial was performed on subjects randomly assigned to either a treatment group or control group. The sample consisted of 60 subjects (N = 60) -30 in the treatment group (n = 30) and the other 30 as a control (n = 30) -and was made up of patients with neck pain and a positive ULNT1. A scapular mobilization was performed on the first group and on the second, a calcaneus abduction adduction on the opposite side from the positive ULNT1 as a placebo.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

22 year–79 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Aitor Vaquero Garrido

Seville, 41009, Spain

About this study

Mechanical cervicalgia is a very frequent and important clinical picture in physiotherapy consultations. It can be considered as a pluripatology as it covers somatic, functional, psychological and social aspects. This ailment is suffered by between 45 and 70% of the general population during some period of life and is one of the most frequent justifications of work leave and the main cause of permanent disability. Mechanical cervicalgia significantly decreases the quality of life of those who suffer from it: it frequently produces a significant disability when generating pain, functional deficit, headaches, movement restriction, vertiginous syndromes, nausea and / or vomiting, etc. This leads to reduced work time and increased health system costs, causing a strong economic and social impact. For example, Borghouts JA and Cols point out that in the Netherlands in 1996 these costs were approximately 686 million dollars, which constituted 1% of total health expenditure and 0.1% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) . In Spain, referrals to the cervicalgia physiotherapy service represent 10% of the total of all health demands; in Britain this percentage reaches 15% and in Canada 30%. Likewise, it should be considered that the direct cost caused by cervicalgia to the health system in our country, specifically to the Primary Care consultation, constitutes 2% of the total, and in some centers this figure reaches up to 12% if they are considered diagnostic tests, pharmaceutical expenses and visits to the specialist.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults with mechanical cervicalgia and a positive median neurodynamic test (ULNT1) reproducing the patient's cervical pain.
  • Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not sign informed consent.
  • Patients who, due to previous malformations or injuries, are not able to be positioned in the position described for the ULNT1 test.
  • Congenital malformations of the cervical spine and / or upper limb.
  • Previous spine surgery.
  • Neurological pathologies diagnosed, such as diabetic polyneuritis or others.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Interscapular muscle release or scapular mobilization technique as described by Travell and Simons.

Other

Patient is sidelying with the testing side up. The auditor stands in front of the patient, reaches over the patient's shoulder to grasp the upper portion of the vertebral border of the scapula, and the other arm reaches under the patient's humerus to grasp the lower portion of the vertebral border of the scapula.

The auditor then slowly moves the scapula into elevation/depression, internal/external rotation/abduction and adduction.

To standardize the technique and be able to reproduce it in each participant, a set of 10 repetitions for each movement was performed in the same order.

Calcaneus abduction and adduction mobilization technique

Other

Abduction and adduction mobilization of the calcaneus is carried out in the opposite side of the upper extremity measured.

Primary outcomes

  1. Goniometer Test

    Time frame: Two minutes

    The axis of the Goniometer is placed On the elbow joint. The stationary arm is lined up with the arm and the moveable arm along the forearm. The subject is asked to perform elbow extension and the angle is measured.

    Improvement of this angle 10º. Inmediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck pain

    Time frame: Two minutes

    Improvement of this 0,5 Newtons. Using a visual pain scale, with values between 0 and 10, the subject marks the intensity level of the neck pain. Inmediately after the intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Hand pressing force

    Time frame: Five minutes

    To measure the grip force of the hand we use the Dynamometer hydraulic baseline (SP-5030J1). We always place the subject in the same position to ensure that the conditions were the same, seated subject, shoulder adducted and in neutral rotation, 90º bend of the elbow, neutral position of the forearm, wrist in slight dorsal flexion (always between 0º and 30º) and a cubital deviation between 0º and 15º.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aitor Vaquero Garrido

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Scapula Mobilization Technique on Neural Mechanosensitivity of Upper Limb Neural Test 1 (ULNT1) in Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain

Acronym: ULNT1

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Nov 19, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 19, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.