Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00355797

Effectiveness of Pacemaker With Closed Loop Stimulation Compared to Pacemakers With and Without Standard Rate Response

This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded, multi-center study involving approximately 1500 patients at 100 centers. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaption technology over both standard rate responsive technology (R) and non-rate responsive mode (DDD) during activities of daily living (ADL).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Bradycardia Arrhythmia, Sinus Arrhythmias, Cardiac Cardiac Conduction System Disease Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Block Heart Diseases Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Sick Sinus Syndrome

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Raymond Fernandez, Albertville, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

All patients enrolled in the CLEAR study are implanted with a Cylos pacemaker with Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS) rate adaption technology. Any legally marketed pacing leads may be implanted with the Cylos family of pacemakers.

Prior to enrollment, patients provide written informed consent and are screened to ensure they are eligible to participate in the study. Patients enrolled in the study must have been implanted within 45 days prior to enrollment or are being considered for implant. Once enrolled and implanted with the Cylos pacemaker, the first 500 patients have 45 days to complete an ADL Testing visit. At the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) testing visit, each of the first 500 enrolled patients performs a 6-minute walk test, orthostatic test, and sweep test in three pacing modes, CLS (DDD-CLS or VVI-CLS), standard rate response (DDDR or VVIR) and non-rate responsive mode (DDD or VVI). The order of the pacing modes for testing is randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. The study primarily analyzes the number of ADL repetitions performed during the 6-minute walk and sweep tests, pulse pressure during the orthostatic test, and secondarily analyzes heart rates during all three tests to compare CLS to both rate responsive and non-rate responsive pacing modes.

For all enrolled patients, the study collects additional data over a 12-month period. Patients are randomized and their pacemaker programmed to one of three pacing modes, CLS, R, or no-rate response in a 2:1:1 ratio, respectively. The patients are then followed for a period of 12 months after the ADL testing (first 500 enrolled patients) or enrollment (patients 501 through 1500). The study collects the following secondary measures to compare CLS to both rate responsive and non-rate responsive pacing modes: changes in 6-minute walk test distance, quality of life, mode reprogramming, atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, cardiac symptoms, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Implanted within the last 45 days or being considered for implant with a BIOTRONIK pacemaker utilizing CLS rate adaptation technology (currently the Cylos family of pacemakers).
  • Ability to give written informed consent
  • Geographically stable and able to return for regular follow-ups for 12 months after ADL testing
  • At least 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients physically limited and unable to perform all or parts of the ADL testing
  • Currently enrolled in any other clinical study
  • Patients with medical reasons that preclude regular participation in the follow-ups

Treatment and study plan

Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS)

Device

Comparison of different pacing modes available on the Cylos pacemaker device. In this intervention group, subjects were programmed to the Closed Loop Stimulation (DDD-CLS or VVI-CLS) pacing mode for the long-term follow-up portion of this study.

Other names: Cylos Pacemaker

Standard Rate Adaptive (R) Technology

Device

Comparison of different pacing modes available on the Cylos pacemaker device. In this intervention group, subjects were programmed to the standard are adaptive pacing mode (DDDR or VVIR) for the long-term follow-up portion of this study.

Other names: Cylos pacemaker

Non-rate adaptive (DDD) pacing

Device

Comparison of different pacing modes available on the Cylos pacemaker device. In this intervention group, subjects were programmed to the non-rate adaptive pacing mode (DDD or VVI) for the long-term follow-up portion of this study.

Other names: Cylos pacemaker

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of Activities of Daily Living Tests (6-minute Walk and Sweep)

    Time frame: within 45 days of enrollment

    Six-minute walk test and sweep test results for subjects completing tests in all three pacing modes and requiring at least 80% pacing during both tests in the CLS and R pacing modes. The mean composite of repetitions (six minute walk plus sweep) are presented.

  2. Pulse Pressure During Activities of Daily Living Tests (Orthostatic Test)

    Time frame: within 45 days of enrollment

    Patients completing the orthostatic test in all three pacing modes and that had at least 80% pacing during the test in the CLS and R pacing modes are included in the analysis. The mean pulse pressure is provided.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

    Change in Quality of life (QOL) score was determined from baseline to the 12 month follow-up visit. The QOL utilized the physical functioning scale of the SF-36 v2, in which a higher score indicates a better health perception. Best possible score was 57.03 while the worst possible score was 14.94.

  2. Mode Reprogramming

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of subjects with device reprogramming from dual (atrial and ventricular pacing) to single chamber (ventricular pacing only) or from single (ventricular pacing only) to dual chamber (atrial and ventricular pacing) during the 12 month follow-up.

  3. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden

    Time frame: 12 months

    AF burden was measured at 12 months as the percentage of total atrial beats that are at or above 160 bpm.

  4. Cardiac Symptoms

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of subjects exhibiting each cardiac symptom was determined at the 12 month follow-up visit.

  5. Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

    Number of subjects with improved, no change, or worsened NYHA classification at the 12-month visit, as compared to baseline. NYHA classifications (I to IV) are used to assess the various stages of heart failure, with Class I relating to mild heart failure and Class IV relating to severe heart failure.

  6. Change in 6-minute Walk Test Distance

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

    Change in number of 10 foot repetitions between baseline and 12-month visit were examined.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biotronik, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

CLEAR: Cylos Pacemaker Responds With Physiologic Rate Changes During Daily Activities

Acronym: CLEAR

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jul 25, 2006
Registry last updated
Dec 20, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.