Aveir DR Leadless Pacemaker System
DevicePatients will undergo a dual chamber leadless pacemaker system implant wherein a leadless pacemaker will be implanted in the right ventricle and right atrium
NCT Number: NCT05252702
Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, international study designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Aveir™ Dual-Chamber (DR) Leadless Pacemaker system.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH, Linz, Upper Austria, Austria
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical safety and effectiveness of the Aveir DR Leadless Pacemaker system in a patient population indicated for a DDD(R) pacemaker.
Subjects participating in the study are followed through at least 12 months with data collected at baseline, implant procedure, pre (hospital) discharge, and follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and every 6 months thereafter until study completion
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will undergo a dual chamber leadless pacemaker system implant wherein a leadless pacemaker will be implanted in the right ventricle and right atrium
Time frame: 3 months
Aveir DR Leadless Pacemaker system complication-free-rate in de novo subjects. A complication was defined as a device-or-procedure-related serious adverse event. Complications included Atrial LP, Ventricular LP, and implant procedure-related complications. Complications possibly related or related to COVID-19 were excluded.
Time frame: 12 months
Aveir DR Leadless Pacemaker system complication-free-rate in de novo subjects. A complication was defined as a device-or-procedure-related serious adverse event. Complications included Atrial LP, Ventricular LP, and implant procedure-related complications. Complications possibly related or related to COVID-19 were excluded.
Time frame: 3 months
Composite success rate of acceptable atrial pacing thresholds and P-wave amplitudes in de novo subjects. A subject was considered to have met the primary effectiveness endpoint #1 if the pacing threshold voltage was ≤ 3.0 V at 0.4 ms at the 3-month visit and the sensed P-wave amplitude was ≥ 1.0 mV at the 3-month visit.
Time frame: 12 months
Composite success rate of acceptable atrial pacing thresholds and P-wave amplitudes in de novo subjects. A subject was considered to have met the success criteria for the endpoint if the pacing threshold voltage was ≤ 3.0 V at 0.4 ms at the 12-month visit and the sensed P-wave amplitude was ≥ 1.0 mV at the 12-month visit.
Time frame: 3 months
AV synchrony success was defined as subjects with a paced or sensed ventricular beat within 300 ms following a paced or sensed atrial beat (i.e., a synchronous cycle) for at least 70% of evaluable cardiac cycles.
Time frame: 3 months
The secondary safety endpoint evaluated a 3-month Atrial LP related complication-free rate based on CEC adjudication of adverse events. An Atrial LP complication was defined as an atrial device-or-procedure-related serious adverse event. Complications that were exclusively related to the Ventricular LP or its delivery/retrieval were not considered Atrial LP complications and were excluded from the evaluation. For a conservative approach, complications that could not exclusively be determined to be related to the ventricular or Atrial LP were still considered Atrial LP complications. For example, procedure-related femoral access complications were adjudicated as Atrial LP complications.
Time frame: 12 months
The secondary safety endpoint analysis evaluated the 12-month Atrial LP related complication-free rate (CFRA) based on CEC adjudication of adverse events. An Atrial LP complication was defined as an atrial device-or-procedure-related serious adverse event. Complications that were exclusively related to the Ventricular LP or its delivery/retrieval were not considered Atrial LP complications and were excluded from the evaluation. For a conservative approach, complications that could not exclusively be determined to be related to the ventricular or Atrial LP were still considered Atrial LP complications. For example, procedure-related femoral access complications were adjudicated as Atrial LP complications. Complications possibly related or related to COVID-19 were excluded.
Time frame: 3 months
Appropriate and proportional rate response of the Aveir Atrial Leadless Pacemaker in de novo subjects was tested during staged exercise testing. Exercise test data provided an estimate of the slope of the normalized increase in sensor-indicated rate versus normalized workload for each subject. Normalizing a variable eliminates the unit and expresses it from 0-1.0. Since both axes are normalized sensor rate and workload, there is no distinct unit of measure. Values on the vertical axis are derived from the difference of the sensor indicated rate at each exercise stage and the base rate, divided by the difference of the age-predicted maximum heart rate and base rate. Values on the horizontal axis are derived from the difference in the workload at each exercise stage and resting workload, divided by the difference of the maximum achieved workload and resting workload. A slope value of 1.0 indicates the pacemaker's sensor-indicated rate increases linearly with an increase in workload.
Abbott Medical Devices
Industry
Aveir Dual-Chamber Leadless i2i IDE Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06620237
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
Adelaide, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT03294317
Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03049722
Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial
Scarborough Village, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01110915
Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Salinas, California, United States
View Trial Details