Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06839573

Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality in Nursing Students' Learning

Teaching using VR for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination (experimental group) will not result in differences in knowledge and skill acquisition compared to traditional classroom-based simulation teaching (control group), but it will lead to greater satisfaction and self-confidence. Open, single-center randomized clinical trial involving fourth-year nursing degree students at a public university. Participants will be assigned based on their usual teaching groups (ratio of 6-8 students per instructor) and, according to randomization, will receive a 1:1 assignment to either the control group (classroom-based simulation teaching) or the experimental group (classroom-based simulation teaching combined with VR headset teaching). The CONSORT checklist will be followed to report the study.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • having completed the scheduled in-person simulation in previous years of the degree .

Exclusion criteria

-the student does not sign the informed consent to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Experience with virtual reality glasses

Other

If the group belongs to GE (teaching with in-person simulation in the classroom and teaching with VR headsets), they will also receive the two training sessions described for GC:

30 minutes of individual training through VR (headsets and controllers to perform actions while receiving immediate feedback through VR) before the in-person simulation.

Other names: Formative intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the satisfaction

    Time frame: Five months

    To compare the satisfaction acquired by students when performing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination between both teaching groups (experimental group - EG: VR plus in-person simulation, control group - CG: in-person simulation). We will mesure this with Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS-Sp) (Farrés-Tarafa et al., 2021) .

  2. Compare the self-confidence

    Time frame: Five months

    To compare the self-confidence acquired by students when performing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination between both teaching groups (experimental group - EG: VR plus in-person simulation, control group - CG: in-person simulation). We will mesure this with Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS-Sp) (Farrés-Tarafa et al., 2021) .

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the acquisition of knowledge in each teaching group.

    Time frame: Five months

    We will use the Knowledge and Skills Checklist to perform basic CPR to measure. Adapted from European Resuscitation Council Guidelines (Perkins et al., 2021), with official translation into Spanish from the Spanish CPR Council and validated in the Boada study (Boada et al., 2015). CPR instructor faculty who does not participate in simulation-based teaching will evaluate the performance in situ of the group during the face-to-face simulation scenario.

  2. To compare the acquisition of skills in each teaching group.

    Time frame: Five months

    We will use the Knowledge and Skills Checklist to perform basic CPR to measure. Adapted from European Resuscitation Council Guidelines (Perkins et al., 2021), with official translation into Spanish from the Spanish CPR Council and validated in the Boada study (Boada et al., 2015). CPR instructor faculty who does not participate in simulation-based teaching will evaluate the performance in situ of the group during the face-to-face simulation scenario.

  3. To evaluate students' tolerance to VR headset technology.

    Time frame: Five months

    To measure this objective, we will use the Student Tolerance Scale for Teaching with VR Glasses used by Martí-Hereu (Martí-Hereu et al., 2024). Evaluate the presence of effects collaterals of the use of VR glasses with six items (nausea, dizziness drowsiness, headache, tranquility, well-being) using a scale Likert (never, rarely, sometimes, most of the time). It will be administered to the students individually at the end of teaching with the VR glasses in both teaching groups (GC after simulation in person; GE before the face-to-face simulation).

  4. To assess the usability of VR headsets by students.

    Time frame: Five months

    USE questionnaire to assess the usefulness, satisfaction and ease of use of a digital technology, developed by Gao (Gao et al., 2018) and adapted to the use of immersive VR glasses with health sciences professionals by Peek (Peek et al., 2023). Scale to assess affinity with technology (ATI scale), validated to our cultural context (Franke et al., 2019).

  5. To analyze the costs of traditional teaching with in-person simulation compared to teaching with VR.

    Time frame: Five months

    With all the results we will be able to analyze the cost-benefit of this new technology.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Isabel Almodóvar-Fernández, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+0034636760923

Marta Raurell-Torredà, phD

CONTACT

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitat Jaume I

Other

Collaborators

  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • University of Barcelona

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve Learning Outcomes in Nursing Degree Students: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Acronym: UBUJIRV25

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 21, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.