Effectiveness of a Positive Mental Health Promotion Programme for Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia

This instrument consists of 39 items that assess thoughts, feelings, and behaviours, grounded in the multifactorial model of Positive Mental Health and its six key factors. The participants were invited to select the frequency option they most identified with, presented on a 4-point Likert scale (1 to 4): "always or almost always" (1), "most of the time" (2), "sometimes" (3), and "rarely or never" (4). This instrument makes it possible to calculate the level of positive mental health for each factor, allowing the identification of which factor, or factors, requires intervention. The score ranges from 39 to 156, with the possibility of categorizing into different levels depending on the results, namely low or languishing (39 to 78), intermediate (79 to 117), high or flourishing (118 to 156), with a higher score representing higher level of Positive Mental Health.

This instrument consists of 39 items that assess thoughts, feelings, and behaviours, grounded in the multifactorial model of Positive Mental Health and its six key factors. The participants were invited to select the frequency option they most identified with, presented on a 4-point Likert scale (1 to 4): "always or almost always" (1), "most of the time" (2), "sometimes" (3), and "rarely or never" (4). This instrument makes it possible to calculate the level of positive mental health for each factor, allowing the identification of which factor, or factors, requires intervention. The score ranges from 39 to 156, with the possibility of categorizing into different levels depending on the results, namely low or languishing (39 to 78), intermediate (79 to 117), high or flourishing (118 to 156), with a higher score representing higher level of Positive Mental Health.

This instrument consists of 39 items that assess thoughts, feelings, and behaviours, grounded in the multifactorial model of Positive Mental Health and its six key factors. The participants were invited to select the frequency option they most identified with, presented on a 4-point Likert scale (1 to 4): "always or almost always" (1), "most of the time" (2), "sometimes" (3), and "rarely or never" (4). This instrument makes it possible to calculate the level of positive mental health for each factor, allowing the identification of which factor, or factors, requires intervention. The score ranges from 39 to 156, with the possibility of categorizing into different levels depending on the results, namely low or languishing (39 to 78), intermediate (79 to 117), high or flourishing (118 to 156), with a higher score representing higher level of Positive Mental Health.

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale with 21 items (DASS-21) is the short version of the original DASS, which is composed of 42 items. This self-reported tool represents a three-part model that assesses emotional states with three subscales: depression, anxiety, and stress. The participants are invited to assess each statement with a 4-point Likert scale (0 to 3), from (0) = "nothing applied to me" to (3) = "applied to me most of the time", indicating the extent to which they experienced each symptom in the last week. The scale provides three scores, one per subscale, ranging from 0 to a maximum of 21. Higher scores represent more negative affective states

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale with 21 items (DASS-21) is the short version of the original DASS, which is composed of 42 items. This self-reported tool represents a three-part model that assesses emotional states with three subscales: depression, anxiety, and stress. The participants are invited to assess each statement with a 4-point Likert scale (0 to 3), from (0) = "nothing applied to me" to (3) = "applied to me most of the time", indicating the extent to which they experienced each symptom in the last week. The scale provides three scores, one per subscale, ranging from 0 to a maximum of 21. Higher scores represent more negative affective states

The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale with 21 items (DASS-21) is the short version of the original DASS, which is composed of 42 items. This self-reported tool represents a three-part model that assesses emotional states with three subscales: depression, anxiety, and stress. The participants are invited to assess each statement with a 4-point Likert scale (0 to 3), from (0) = "nothing applied to me" to (3) = "applied to me most of the time", indicating the extent to which they experienced each symptom in the last week. The scale provides three scores, one per subscale, ranging from 0 to a maximum of 21. Higher scores represent more negative affective states

This self-report instrument measures objective and subjective burden, providing useful information on the impact of caregiving in areas such as health, social and personal life, financial condition, emotional well-being, perception of self-efficacy, and interpersonal relationships, as reported by caregivers. Each item is scored from (1) = "never" to a maximum of (5) = "nearly always". This scale presents a score range from 22 to 110, where a higher score corresponds to a greater perceived burden, with the following cut-off points: no burden (22-46 points), mild burden (47-55 points), and severe burden (56-110 points)

This self-report instrument measures objective and subjective burden, providing useful information on the impact of caregiving in areas such as health, social and personal life, financial condition, emotional well-being, perception of self-efficacy, and interpersonal relationships, as reported by caregivers. Each item is scored from (1) = "never" to a maximum of (5) = "nearly always". This scale presents a score range from 22 to 110, where a higher score corresponds to a greater perceived burden, with the following cut-off points: no burden (22-46 points), mild burden (47-55 points), and severe burden (56-110 points)

This self-report instrument measures objective and subjective burden, providing useful information on the impact of caregiving in areas such as health, social and personal life, financial condition, emotional well-being, perception of self-efficacy, and interpersonal relationships, as reported by caregivers. Each item is scored from (1) = "never" to a maximum of (5) = "nearly always". This scale presents a score range from 22 to 110, where a higher score corresponds to a greater perceived burden, with the following cut-off points: no burden (22-46 points), mild burden (47-55 points), and severe burden (56-110 points)

Participant characteristics: age, sex, education, marital status, employment status, relationship to care recipient, years as a caregiver, daily hours of care, cohabitation/distance, sole caregiver status, caregiver training, area of residence, available support, and free time

This questionnaire was developed by the research team to assess caregivers' satisfaction with the programme, including perceived usefulness, applicability in daily life, adequacy of the sessions, clarity of the materials, session format, and facilitator performance.