Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05428462

Effectiveness of a One-day Psychoeducation Program on Internalized Stigmatization for BPD Patients

Education day on borderline personality disorder (BPD), including a transmission of current scientific knowledge on the disease. A dimensional understanding of BPD is delivered as well as disidentification of oneself to the symptoms of borderline personality disorder (Ducasse 2020 Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci). The main objective is to evaluate the impact of borderline education day on self-stigma.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Hospital

Montpellier, 34000, France

About this study

Borderline personality disorder defined as "a pattern of instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image and affects, and impulsiveness marked" concerns 4-6% of the general population. This is the emotional trouble the most associated with the occurence of suicide attempts (85% of these patients make multiple suicide attempts) and death by suicide (10% of these patients). This is a major public health problem.

A large number of patients with borderline personality disorder are not informed of their diagnosis. The main reasons are : the non-recognition of this disorder by health professionals, the belief that borderline personality disorder is a overly stigmatizing diagnosis , or preference to diagnose another disorder - that professionals think respond better to treatments and therefore be of a better prognosis.

Patients with borderline personality disorder often think themselves as "bad people" or the only people suffering from these symptoms. Thus, the ignorance of borderline personality disorder by patients leads to a basis of their altered sense of identity, perceived as defective or isolated. This generate a strong internalized stigma.

Many people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder receive no information about this disorder while psychoeducation has shown its effectiveness in severe psychiatric disorders, including the disorder of borderline personality, by reducing the negative repercussions psychiatric pathology. Moreover, the education of patients suffering from self-stigma makes it possible to in the face of negative beliefs around the disease and the acquisition of knowledge about the disorder and how to deal with it reduces self-stigma in bipolar patients. However, the propensity to feel shame - the stigmatization of oneself as worthless - is strongest in borderline personality disorder compared to all psychiatric disorders and most associated with the occurence of suicidal behaviors. In recommendations with good clinical practice, the investigator propose within the sector a day of education on borderline personality disorder including a transmission of current scientific knowledge on the illness, a dimensional understanding of the disorder, and the dis-identification of self to the symptoms of borderline personality disorder. The investigator hypothesize that this day of psychoeducation makes it possible to decrease self-stigma, which could be a mediator in reducing negative repercussions of borderline pathology.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Borderline Personality disorder assessed according to SCID II
  • Having attended the borderline education day

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

Psychoeducation day on borderline personality disorder

Other

Transmission of latest knowledge on borderline personality disorder

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of internalized stigma of mental illnessillness

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of internalized stigma of mental illness between pre-treatment

  2. Comparison of internalized stigma of mentalillness

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of internalized stigma of mental illness between pre-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of depressive symptoms between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  2. Depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of depressive symptoms between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  3. Severity of suicidal ideation evaluated by the likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible suicidal ideation)

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of suicidal ideation between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  4. Severity of suicidal ideation evaluated by the likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible suicidal ideation)

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of suicidal ideation between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  5. Psychological pain using the Likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible pain)

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of psychological pain between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  6. Psychological pain using the Likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible pain)

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of psychological pain between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  7. The intensity of hopelessness using the Likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible hopelessness)

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of hopelessness between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  8. The intensity of hopelessness using the Likert scales from 0 (none) to 10 (maximum possible hopelessness)

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of hopelessness between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  9. The intensity of optimism using analog visual scale

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of optimism between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  10. The intensity of optimism using analog visual scale

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of the intensity of optimism between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  11. Feeling of pleasure using the quality of life questionnaire on pleasure and satisfaction

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of feeling of pleasure between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  12. Feeling of pleasure using the quality of life questionnaire on pleasure and satisfaction

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of feeling of pleasure between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  13. Feeling of satisfaction using the quality of life questionnaire on pleasure and satisfaction

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of feeling of satisfaction between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  14. Feeling of satisfaction using the quality of life questionnaire on pleasure and satisfaction

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of feeling of satisfaction between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  15. Anxiety state using the State-Trait Inventory (STAI-State)

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of the state of anxiety between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  16. Anxiety state using the State-Trait Inventory (STAI-State)

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of the state of anxiety between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  17. Hopelessness using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of the hopelessness between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  18. Hopelessness using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS)

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of the hopelessness between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

  19. Level of positive and negative affects using the PANAS Scale

    Time frame: At immediate post-intervention

    Comparison of level of positive and negative affects between pre-treatment and post-intervention

  20. Level of positive and negative affects using the PANAS Scale

    Time frame: At 3 months post-intervention

    Comparison of level of positive and negative affects between pre-treatment and 3 months post-intervention

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effectiveness of a One-day Psychoeducation Program on Internalized Stigmatization for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Patients

Acronym: EDUC-BPD

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jun 23, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 5, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.