Massachusetts Avenue Project
Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States
NCT Number: NCT04246593
Investigators will test the effectiveness of the Veggie Van model across multiple organizations and sites using a cluster-randomized design and will document the implementation process to understand what factors are associated with dietary change and sustainability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Buffalo, New York, 14222, United States
After 9 qualified organizations have been identified among applicants, investigators will randomize proposed Mobile Market (MM) sites (33 total across all partner organizations), to an intervention (Mobile Market program implementation) or comparison condition (extended planning). Randomization will be stratified within each organization so that each organization will have 2 intervention and 2 comparison sites. One organization will have 5 sites. The 5th site will allow for more thorough testing of protocol procedures. This ensures that study groups will be balanced at the organizational level. The condition for which each proposed MM location was selected will be communicated at the time of award. Organizations will communicate to intervention sites that they want to open a MM at that location within the next year. Organizations will communicate to comparison sites that they want to work with them on a food systems planning process to determine if a MM program is the right fit for their location. At the end of the year-long planning process with comparison sites, the organization and proposed MM site will decide together how to proceed (start a MM, apply for grant funding for a different project; etc.).
Both arms will undergo community engagement efforts that serve to both identify potential research participants and engage them in the planning for a MM. Intervention sites will work with a community advisory committee to develop an engagement plan to raise community awareness of the forthcoming MM.
Comparison sites will work with a community advisory committee to engage community members in a food access planning process.
Both intervention and comparison sites will distribute interest forms as part of the community engagement process.Research staff will identify from the interest forms those interested in participating in the study. Consent will be obtained via phone. Phone surveys and in-person data collection will then be completed.
Market (Intervention Sites) will implement a Mobile Market, weekly, for at least 10 months that will follow the Veggie Van model that includes 3 research supported components:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mobile Market program implementation includes utilizing a Veggie Van model which sells reduced cost locally-grown produce in communities with barriers to accessing fresh F&Vs because of availability, cost, or lack of produce preparation skills.The Veggie Van visits sites that already serve the target market (e.g., lower-income housing communities, community health centers, community colleges). While Mobile Market programs vary in their model and operation, we believe that the three components of Veggie Van's success are it's "share" model, price reductions (incentives), and educational component
Time frame: 12 months
Change in Fruit & Vegetable (F&V) intake (servings/day) at 12 months will be calculated from four 24-hour recalls (2 at baseline and 2 at 12-months) which will be administered over the phone by trained interviewers (in English or Spanish). One recall at each time point will be from a weekday and the other from a weekend day. The 24-hour dietary recalls will be collected using the Nutrition Data Systems for Research (NDSR) computer-based software application developed at the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC); NDSR uses a five pass interview approach with interview prompts in English and Spanish (49). The NCC Food and Nutrient Database serves as the source of food composition information in NDSR (50). When a participant completes their in-person data collection, participants will receive The Food Amounts Booklet to have as a visual reference during the 24-hour recall. This booklet is compatible with the NDSR program.
Time frame: 12 months
BMI will be calculated at baseline and 12 months from weight measured using a Seca 876 digital scale (maximum capacity of 250 kg) and height measured to the nearest 1/8 inch using a Seca stadiometer. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2
Time frame: 12 months
Dermal Carotenoids will be measured using a finger scan technology called the "Veggie Meter" which relies on pressure mediated Raman Spectroscopy (RS) and is thought to be a valid indicator of changes in skin carotenoids in response to dietary carotenoid consumption. Dermal Carotenoids are measured on a scale of 0 to 800, with 0 representing the absence of dermal carotenoids and 800 representing the maximum possible score for dietary carotenoids. A higher dermal carotenoid score indicates a greater presence of dietary carotenoids, and as such a better outcome. Change between baseline and follow-up scores will be calculated for each group.
Time frame: 12 months
Self-efficacy to purchase, prepare and eat fresh F&V were measured using a 10-point Likert scale, where 10 indicates easiest (most self-efficacy, better outcome) and 1 indicates hardest (least self-efficacy, worse outcome), applied to a selection of 8 items adapted from a study of shoppers where self-efficacy was shown to be correlated with nutrition behaviors and will serve as a comprehensive assessment of the effect of the educational intervention. The 8 items' scores were summed to create a total self-efficacy score ranging from 8 (least total self-efficacy, worse outcome) to 80 (most total self-efficacy, better outcome) for each participant. The measured outcome is the difference between the mean baseline total self-efficacy score and the mean follow-up total self-efficacy score for each group (change).
Time frame: 12 months
Benefits (expectations) and barriers to eating F&V were measured with 12 questions using a 4-point Likert scale (1 indicates strongly disagree, 2 indicates disagree, 3 indicates agree, and 4 indicates strongly agree) previously tested in lower-income adults which reflects common benefits/barriers found in the literature. The 12 individual question scores were summed to generate the total barriers score, with a minimum score of 12 (strongly disagree) and a maximum score of 48 (strongly agree). For all scales, a higher number indicates higher perceived barriers and therefore a worse outcome. The lower the score the better the outcome.
University at Buffalo
Other
Effectiveness and Implementation of a Research Tested Mobile Produce Market Designed to Improve Diet in Underserved Communities
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02594319
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Incentive Interventions
View Trial DetailsNCT05900739
Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Valladolid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04240782
Cooking Frequency, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
Urbana, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03026608
Food Insecurity, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
View Trial Details