Faculty of dental medicine, Al-Azhar University (Assiut branch)
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71524, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06689969
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of osseodensification vs. traditional implant site preparation clinically , radiographically, bio-chemically. in patients of both sexes, ages 25 to 45, who had bilaterally missed maxillary teeth. The main questions it aims to answer are :which technique was the better results give at implant placement? Researchers will compare Osseodensification maneuver in implant placement to see if implant stability increased also peri-implant tissue accurately formed or the same in traditional implant site preparation. Participants will receiving dental implants in narrow maxillary posterior ridge via small diameter implant in conventional method in first entity while in second entity implant by osseodensification technique using densah bur.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71524, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Site marking was the first step in preparing the place for implantation. Subsequently, using a high speed surgical handpiece and a surgical motor, a pilot drill was revolved at 1200 RPM in a clockwise rotation to the desired depth, creating a 1.5 mm first pilot osteotomy. An X-ray was obtained using paralleling pins to validate the angle between the surrounding teeth and the implants. Eventually the implant's precise placement was established. To prepare the osteotomy site to the desired diameter, drills are used sequentially at 1200 RPM in a clockwise motion. Gradually bigger drill diameters were used for incremental drilling. Based on the diameter of the desired implant, bur sizes were utilized in ascending order
Beginning with site marking, the area was prepared for implantation. A high speed surgical handpiece and a surgical motor (surgic pro® NSK, Japan) were then used to construct a 1.5 mm initial pilot osteotomy using a pilot drill spun at 1200 RPM in a clockwise rotation to the desired depth. In order to verify the angle between the surrounding teeth and the implants, paralleling pins were used to capture an X-ray.
After it was determined that the implant was in the proper location, OD was used to extend the osteotomy using a Densah® Bur VT1525 2.0-mm (VersahTM, LLC, USA) in non-cutting anticlockwise rotation at 1200 RPM (Densifying Mode). The osteotomy was expanded to the desired diameter by repeatedly using a DensahTM Bur operating in a non-cutting anticlockwise (CCW) direction at 1200 RPM (Densifying Mode). Gradually increasing drill diameters were used for incremental drilling. Based on the diameter of the desired implant, bur sizes (diameters) were utilised in ascending order
Time frame: A single time point (once immediately after implant placement)
Osstell® Mentor magnetic resonance instrument used to measure primary stability
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks" (at the beginning, one, three-, and six-months following implant insertion)
Measuring of bone density (BD) through using the image J analysis software application
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks" (at the beginning, one, three-, and six-months following implant insertion)
Time frame: [Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks" (at the beginning, one, three-, and six-months following implant insertion)]
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks" (at the beginning, three-, and six-months following implant insertion)
Al-Azhar University
Other
Evaluation of the Effect of Osseodensification on the Peri-implant Condition
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07569146
Implant Therapy
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07001813
Implant Therapy
Ismailia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06862505
Biological Width, Implant Therapy
Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06791655
Class II Extraction Sockets, Implant Therapy
Tanta, Elgharbia, Egypt
View Trial Details