Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
NCT Number: NCT04125173
With the limited evidence that lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improve postoperative pain in laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for benign indications, we would like to determine if we can both further validate this idea but also show that it has minimal effect on physician satisfaction performing the surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States
Minimally invasive hysterectomy, including conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy, is a commonly performed gynecologic surgery that universally results in postoperative pain for patients. Opioid medications are helpful to control postoperative pain and are routinely given to women who undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy. However, opioid abuse is on the rise in the United States, and there is increased awareness of misuse leading to abuse, overdose, and chronic opioid use. In addition to narcotic usage, postoperative pain also has negative effects on patient satisfaction and length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) leading to potential hospital admission. There is existing evidence that reducing the pressure used to create the pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery may affect pain scores that patients endorse in the PACU. Due to improved postoperative pain, patients may have decreased opioid use in the PACU and at home, shorter hospital stay, and improved overall patient satisfaction. If lower pneumoperitoneum pressures during laparoscopic surgery can be shown to reduce postoperative pain, then the ultimate question becomes whether there is ability to adapt this practice of using lower pressures to maintain pneumoperitoneum. It is unclear whether physician satisfaction will be affected.
There are several publications investigating the effect of lower pneumoperitoneum pressures on postoperative pain. A systematic review in 2016 included 238 patients (three RCTs), showed pneumoperitoneum pressures of 8mmHg had a statistically significant although minimal decrease in postoperative pain compared to 12mmHg, although lower pressures were associated with worse visualization. The authors concluded that the systematic review was inconclusive and further studies were necessary. A randomized pilot study with 60 patients comparing low pressure (7mmHg) using the AirSeal System versus standard insufflation (15mmHg), showed lower postoperative shoulder pain in the group with lower pressure using the AirSeal system. Two abstracts in the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology present retrospective studies showing decreased postoperative pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressure. The first abstract is from 2015, included a sample size of 170 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 85 patients in each arm (12mmHg and 15mmHg). They showed no difference in median recovery time in the PACU and significantly lower median first pain score (5 vs 6, p=.04). The second abstract is from 2018 and included a sample size of 598 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 99 patients in 15mmHg arm, 100 patients in 12mmHg arm, 99 patients in 10mmHg arm, and 300 patients in 8mmHg arm. They showed lower initial pain scores with each degree of lower pressure (5.9 vs 5.4 vs 4.4 vs 3.8, p=<.0001) and shorter hospital stays with lower pressures. They showed no difference in operative times or blood loss in the four arms. Similar studies have been done with cholecystectomy patients that have shown improved postoperative shoulder pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressures. There is also an ongoing clinical trial that is still recruiting patients that is studying this similar comparison using 9mmHg vs 15mmHg with and without the AirSeal system.
However, the literature summarized here has never included blinding the intervention of lower pneumoperitoneum pressure to the surgeon to determine awareness of pressure and its effect on visualization and physician satisfaction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 1
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 2
Randomized pneumoperitoneum 3
Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Physician satisfaction questionnaire completed immediately postoperative, 3 questions in length and measured with VAS score (0-5)
Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire is presumed pneumoperitoneum pressure, measured as 10mmHg, 12mmHg, or 15mmHg (circle one - 10mmHg, 12mmHg, 15mmHg)
Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative
Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire are two yes/no questions on effect of pneumoperitoneum on visualization and operative time (circle one - yes, no)
Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Self reported pain intensity in PACU (VAS 0-10) first reported and maximum pain score, pain score at 6 hours postoperative, and pain score at 24 hours postoperative
Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Self reported shoulder pain intensity (VAS 0-10) at 6 hours postoperative and pain score at 24 hours postoperative
Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Morphine equivalent units in PACU and at 24 hours postoperative
Time frame: From completion of surgery to hospital discharge time up to 7 days
Time in minutes of length of stay in hospital
Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative
Patient satisfaction questionnaire completed 24 hours postoperative over the phone, 2 questions in length, VAS score (0-5) on satisfaction with overall postoperative pain and shoulder postoperative pain
Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery
Peak inspiratory pressure
Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery
Tidal volume
Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery
End tidal CO2
University of Arizona
Other
The Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07398313
Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Cervical Cancer
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
View Trial DetailsNCT07686510
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorder, Hysterectomy
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07651449
Hysterectomy
Gaziantep, Şahinbey/gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07306507
Hysterectomy, Neurologic Manifestations
Diyarbakır, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details