Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04125173

Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy

With the limited evidence that lower pneumoperitoneum pressures improve postoperative pain in laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for benign indications, we would like to determine if we can both further validate this idea but also show that it has minimal effect on physician satisfaction performing the surgery.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Banner University Medical Center Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona, 85006, United States

About this study

Minimally invasive hysterectomy, including conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy, is a commonly performed gynecologic surgery that universally results in postoperative pain for patients. Opioid medications are helpful to control postoperative pain and are routinely given to women who undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy. However, opioid abuse is on the rise in the United States, and there is increased awareness of misuse leading to abuse, overdose, and chronic opioid use. In addition to narcotic usage, postoperative pain also has negative effects on patient satisfaction and length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) leading to potential hospital admission. There is existing evidence that reducing the pressure used to create the pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery may affect pain scores that patients endorse in the PACU. Due to improved postoperative pain, patients may have decreased opioid use in the PACU and at home, shorter hospital stay, and improved overall patient satisfaction. If lower pneumoperitoneum pressures during laparoscopic surgery can be shown to reduce postoperative pain, then the ultimate question becomes whether there is ability to adapt this practice of using lower pressures to maintain pneumoperitoneum. It is unclear whether physician satisfaction will be affected.

There are several publications investigating the effect of lower pneumoperitoneum pressures on postoperative pain. A systematic review in 2016 included 238 patients (three RCTs), showed pneumoperitoneum pressures of 8mmHg had a statistically significant although minimal decrease in postoperative pain compared to 12mmHg, although lower pressures were associated with worse visualization. The authors concluded that the systematic review was inconclusive and further studies were necessary. A randomized pilot study with 60 patients comparing low pressure (7mmHg) using the AirSeal System versus standard insufflation (15mmHg), showed lower postoperative shoulder pain in the group with lower pressure using the AirSeal system. Two abstracts in the Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology present retrospective studies showing decreased postoperative pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressure. The first abstract is from 2015, included a sample size of 170 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 85 patients in each arm (12mmHg and 15mmHg). They showed no difference in median recovery time in the PACU and significantly lower median first pain score (5 vs 6, p=.04). The second abstract is from 2018 and included a sample size of 598 patients who underwent benign robotic gynecologic surgery, 99 patients in 15mmHg arm, 100 patients in 12mmHg arm, 99 patients in 10mmHg arm, and 300 patients in 8mmHg arm. They showed lower initial pain scores with each degree of lower pressure (5.9 vs 5.4 vs 4.4 vs 3.8, p=<.0001) and shorter hospital stays with lower pressures. They showed no difference in operative times or blood loss in the four arms. Similar studies have been done with cholecystectomy patients that have shown improved postoperative shoulder pain with lower pneumoperitoneum pressures. There is also an ongoing clinical trial that is still recruiting patients that is studying this similar comparison using 9mmHg vs 15mmHg with and without the AirSeal system.

However, the literature summarized here has never included blinding the intervention of lower pneumoperitoneum pressure to the surgeon to determine awareness of pressure and its effect on visualization and physician satisfaction.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients
  • greater than or equal to 18 years old
  • English-speaking
  • undergoing laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy for benign indications by one of the two minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons at Banner University Medical Center - Phoenix

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with body max index >35
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score III or IV
  • preoperative uterine weight estimated to be greater than 500gm (measured by sonography and using the following formula: length x width x anteroposterior diameter x 0.52)
  • patients on chronic opioids for chronic pain (defined as > 3 months regular opioid use)
  • patients who refuse participation in the study
  • patients who do not provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 15mmHg

Other

Randomized pneumoperitoneum 1

Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 12mm Hg

Other

Randomized pneumoperitoneum 2

Pneumoperitoneum pressure = 10mmHg

Other

Randomized pneumoperitoneum 3

Primary outcomes

  1. Physician Satisfaction Part 1

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative

    Physician satisfaction questionnaire completed immediately postoperative, 3 questions in length and measured with VAS score (0-5)

  2. Physician Satisfaction Part 2

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative

    Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire is presumed pneumoperitoneum pressure, measured as 10mmHg, 12mmHg, or 15mmHg (circle one - 10mmHg, 12mmHg, 15mmHg)

  3. Physician Satisfaction Part 3

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to one hour postoperative

    Included in the physician satisfaction questionnaire are two yes/no questions on effect of pneumoperitoneum on visualization and operative time (circle one - yes, no)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative

    Self reported pain intensity in PACU (VAS 0-10) first reported and maximum pain score, pain score at 6 hours postoperative, and pain score at 24 hours postoperative

  2. Postoperative Shoulder Pain

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative

    Self reported shoulder pain intensity (VAS 0-10) at 6 hours postoperative and pain score at 24 hours postoperative

Other outcomes

  1. Narcotic usage

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative

    Morphine equivalent units in PACU and at 24 hours postoperative

  2. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to hospital discharge time up to 7 days

    Time in minutes of length of stay in hospital

  3. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: From completion of surgery to 24 hours postoperative

    Patient satisfaction questionnaire completed 24 hours postoperative over the phone, 2 questions in length, VAS score (0-5) on satisfaction with overall postoperative pain and shoulder postoperative pain

  4. Intraoperative Respiratory Parameters: Peak inspiratory pressure

    Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery

    Peak inspiratory pressure

  5. Intraoperative Respiratory Parameters: Tidal volume

    Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery

    Tidal volume

  6. Intraoperative Respiratory Parameters: End tidal CO2

    Time frame: From start of surgery to end of surgery

    End tidal CO2

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Arizona

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Lower Pneumoperitoneum Pressure During Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 14, 2019
Registry last updated
Dec 7, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.