Low level laser therapy
RadiationOther names: Photobiomodulation
NCT Number: NCT04381442
The aim of this study was to determine whether orthodontically moved maxillary canines exposed to two different protocols and dosage of LLLT exhibited differences in amount and rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me15 year–25 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fifteen orthodontic patients, 12 females and 3males, with a mean age of 17.48 ± 2.95 years were included. They had a clinical indication for bilateral extraction of at least first maxillary premolars. Using a split mouth design, maxillary left and right sides were randomly divided into two groups. In group 1, LLLT was delivered at 10 points; 5 from buccal and 5 from palatal aspects with a total dose of 8 Joule (J) per session that distributed as follows; 2 cervical, 1 middle, 2 apical. In group II, laser was applied from buccal side only at 5 points through the same order with a dose of 4 J per session. In both protocols, maxillary canines were irradiated with a gallium aluminum-arsenide diode laser in continuous mode with 635 nm, 100 mW, 25 J/cm2, 8 seconds/ point, 0.8 J/point. Both sides were distalized by a standard protocol with uniform 150 gm retraction force via a nickel-titanium closed coil spring. In both protocols, laser regimen was applied on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 in the 1st month, and thereafter on every 15th day until 6-month observation period of canine retraction phase. Amount and monthly rate of maxillary canine retraction and degree of anchorage loss were determined by direct intraoral and indirect 3D digital models measurements. Evaluations were undertaken immediately before initiating retraction (T0), after 4 weeks (T1), after 8 weeks (T2), after 12 weeks (T3), after 16 weeks (T4), after 20 weeks (T5), and after 24 weeks (T6). Significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Photobiomodulation
Time frame: 6 Months
Evaluation and comparison of amount and monthly rate of distal movement of maxillary canine, in both groups, that were determined by direct intraoral measurements and indirect measurements of 3D scanned study models
Time frame: 6 Months
Evaluation and comparison of the amount of maxillary molar mesial movement (anchorage loss) between both groups via study models assessment.
Al-Azhar University
Other
Consequence of Two Protocols and Energy Doses of Low Level Laser Therapy on the Rate of Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Prospective Clinical Evaluation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06278116
Dental Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05615688
Dental Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06897852
Dental Malocclusion, Diagnosis
Asyut, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05144555
Dental Malocclusion, Malocclusion
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial Details