Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05574660

Effect of High-fat/High-sugar Diet on Food Reward Signaling

In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. All participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention.

At all time points the investigators acquire the following parameters:

* Body weight and composition, * Blood parameters to control for metabolic changes, * Visual analog scales (hunger, satiety, tiredness, etc.), * Fat and sugar concentration preference, * Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during a learning and a gustatory perception task.

The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and will have an impact on brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. The investigators test the effect of this dietary intervention on body weight, metabolic parameters such as insulin sensitivity, blood cholesterol and triglycerides, the preference of fat and sugar taste, the brain response to milkshake anticipation and consumption, and as the neuronal coding of prediction error learning. Here, all participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention using behavioral tasks, fMRI and blood sampling. The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and impact brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • right handed
  • non-smoker (for the last 1 year not smoked more than 2 cigarettes per month)
  • Body Mass Index between 20-27 kg/m2 (healthy weight)

Exclusion criteria

  • serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
  • past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
  • current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria including eating disorders,
  • medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
  • history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
  • ongoing pregnancy;
  • known taste or smell dysfunction;
  • a diagnosis of diabetes;
  • any known food allergy, certain food sensitivities (lactose);
  • pregnant or nursing women,
  • history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
  • history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation.

Treatment and study plan

High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet

Dietary Supplement

Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet

Dietary Supplement

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in fat taste preference after 8-weeks dietary intervention

    Time frame: Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.

    In the fat and sugar concentration preference task, the preference and perception are evaluated using a series of puddings with varying fat content (0%, 3.1%, 6.9%, and 15.6 %), and sugar concentration using apple juice with varying sucrose content (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.56 M, and 1 M). Each pudding and juice concentration is tested 12 times and the average is calculated. "Wanting" and "Liking" are assessed for all concentrations and the change between baseline and the post-intervention is assessed in both HF/HS and LF/LS groups.

  2. Change brain response to milkshake anticipation and milkshake consumption after 8-weeks dietary intervention

    Time frame: BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.

    To test the effect of the dietary intervention on brain responses to milkshake anticipation (milkshake predicting cue) and consumption (milkshake delivery), the investigators performed a gustatory perception task. The BOLD response while milkshake cue presentation and milkshake delivery was compared between baseline and postintervention and compared between groups.

  3. Change in neuronal encoding of prediction error processing after 8-weeks dietary intervention.

    Time frame: BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.

    A short version of the sensory learning task as described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2019) was performed to assess associative learning independent of food rewards, while undergoing fMRI. Within this model, the investigators computed the (signed) adaptive precision error relating to the precision-weighted choice prediction error about visual outcome, that is, the product of choice prediction error (a) and the adaptive learning rate (b). The investigators tested the BOLD response related to choice prediction error and compared it between baseline and post-intervention and between the HF/HS and LF/LS group.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research

Other

Collaborators

  • Yale University

Registry information

Official study title

Influence of High Fat Feeding on Brain and Behaviour in Individuals at Genetic Risk of Obesity

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Oct 10, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 10, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.