Taha Pergel
Istanbul, Fatih, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06233188
The goal of this clinical trial is to show the effect of patient specific lateral nasal wall osteotomy to the pterygomaxillary separation during Le Fort I down-fracture.
Participants will be divided into two treatment groups. In study group, surgery planned according to the patients' indivudial anatomy and in the conventional group, surgery planned according to mean anatomical datas.
Researchers will compare patient specific lateral nasal wall osteotomy to see if it affects the pterygomaxillary junction seperation during le fort I downfracture.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Fatih, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
The same surgical team performed the osteotomies under general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation. Hypotensive anesthesia was applied as a standard protocol in all patients. Orthognathic surgery, including Le Fort I and sagittal split ramus osteotomy, was used to correct skeletal deformities.
Bone osteotomy was initiated on the bilateral wall of the maxilla with piezosurgery after a mucosal incision and flap elevation.Lateral nasal osteotomy (LNO) with Nievert Anderson single guarded osteotome, median septum separation with double guarded U-shaped osteotome, and pterygomaxillary junction separation with curved osteotome were performed before the down-fracture. The only difference between the conventional and study groups was the depth of the LNO. In the study group, LNO was performed at a depth of 2 mm less than the measured distance in the axial section. In the conventional osteotomy group, LNO was performed at 30 mm for females and 35 mm for males, as suggested in the literature. A curved osteotome and a mallet were used in each case to separate the pterygomaxillary junction. The down-fracture of the maxilla was performed using a hook and a bone spreader in all patients. When the maxilla was down-fractured, LNW and the pterygomaxillary separation types were assessed intraoperatively. The maxilla was stabilized in its new position by four L-shaped osteosynthesis mini-plates at the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the aperture piriformis regions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
surgery that correcting the maxilla and mandible related with each other
Time frame: 1 year
The primary outcome variable is lateral nasal wall separation:
Type 1 Separation from the osteotomy line
Type 2 Separation 2-4 mm above the osteotomy line
Type 3 Separation 4 mm or more above the osteotomy line
Time frame: 1 year
The secondary outcome variable is pterygomaxillary separation
Type 1 Separation including the tuber maxilla
Type 2 Separation from the pterygomaxillary junction
Type 3 Separation including the pterygoid plates
Bezmialem Vakif University
Other
Does the Patient-specific Depth of the Lateral Nasal Wall Osteotomy Affect the Pterygomaxillary Separation During le Fort I Down-fracture?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03702881
Malocclusion, Open Bite
Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07511296
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07730944
Malocclusion, Mouth Diseases
Najran, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT07628491
Esthetics, Dental, Malocclusion
Sibiu, Sibiu County, Romania
View Trial Details