Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
NCT Number: NCT03493282
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Oral CT1812 in Subjects with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510, United States
This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of two doses of CT1812 in adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease to evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral CT1812, administered for up 180 days for the Primary study and another 180 days for the double-blind extension study.
Each participant and caregiver participated in a screening period of up to 60 days, followed by the primary double-blind treatment period of 24 weeks (169 days +/-2) followed by an optional double-blind extension treatment period of another 24 weeks (337 days +/-2).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CT1812
CT1812
Matching Placebo
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Number of subjects reported with AEs and the number of AEs reported following administration of the IP summarized by treatment and grouped according to system organ class and preferred term, using descriptive statistics. Summaries of AEs were also presented by severity and by relationship to investigational product. In these summaries, subjects were counted only once per MedDRA term, for the AE of highest severity or least favorable relationship. Summaries were also presented of SAEs and of AEs leading to study withdrawal.
Time frame: Day 169
The Distribution Volume Ratio (DVR) was used to determine the correlations with the cognitive and functional endpoints. For 11C UCB J, the imaging outcome measure was DVR as produced by the Simplified Reference Tissue Model (SRTM2) using dynamic scan data from 0 to 60 min and the whole cerebellum as a reference region. Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates the progression of disease.
Time frame: Day 169
For 18F FDG, the primary imaging outcome measure was the SUVR from 60-90 min post injection using whole cerebellum as a reference region. For SUVR, a composite region was determined, including: prefrontal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate/precuneus, anterior cingulate, lateral parietal, medial temporal, and lateral occipital regions. Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates the progression of the disease.
Time frame: Day 169
A composite region of AD affected brain regions was determined, including prefrontal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate/precuneus, anterior cingulate, lateral parietal, medial temporal, and lateral occipital regions. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study drug. Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates the progression of disease.
Time frame: Day 169
For resting state functional MRI, the outcome was ICC. With this approach a map of the total connectivity of each voxel to all other voxels was computed. For ICC, a composite region of AD affected brain regions was determined, including prefrontal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate/precuneus, anterior cingulate, lateral parietal, medial temporal, and lateral occipital regions. Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates the progression of disease.
Time frame: Day 169
Change from baseline in CSF Aβ 40, CSF Aβ 42, CSF tau, CSF phospho-tau, CSF neurogranin (NRGN), CSF synaptotagmin, CSF(SNAP25), and CSF neurofilament light (NFL). Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value.
Time frame: Day 169
The ADAS-Cog11 total score = the sum of all 11 individual items (word recall [10]; commands [5]; constructional praxis [5]; naming objects and fingers [5]; ideational praxis [5]; orientation [8]; word recognition [12]; remembering test instructions [5]; spoken language [5]; word finding [5]; and comprehension of spoken language [5]). The score range for ADAS-cog 11 is 0-70 where a higher score is worse performance. The ADAS-cog methodology is to sum scores for subscales. The results were calculated using the average change from baseline. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study drug is administered. Change is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Day 169
The ADAS-Cog13 total score includes all of the items in the ADAS-Cog11 and the delayed word recall and the number cancellation. For the ADAS-cog 13 the range is 0-85 (score range for Delayed Word Recall [DWR] score is 0-10 and for Number Cancellation [NC] is 0-5, thus the score is ADAS-cog 11[0-70] plus the scores for DWR and NC). A higher score indicates worse performance. The ADAS-cog methodology is to sum scores for subscales. The results were calculated using the average change from baseline. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study drug. Change is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in cognitive function.
Time frame: Day 169
The ADAS-Cog14 total score includes all of the items in the ADAS-Cog13 [0-85] and the maze item which has a score range of 0-5. Thus, the total score for the ADAS-cog 14 is 0-90 where again a higher score is worst performance. The ADAS-cog methodology is to sum scores for subscales. The results were calculated using the average change from baseline. Baseline is defined as the last measurement taken before the first dose of study drug is administered. Change is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in cognitive function.
Time frame: Day 169
The ADCS-ADL is a 23-item informant-administered assessment of functional impairment in terms of activities of daily living. Informants respond to 23 questions about the subject's involvement and level of performance across items representing daily living. The questions range from basic to instrumental activities of daily living. Each item is rated from the highest level of independent performance to complete loss. The total score range is from 0-78 with lower scores indicating greater functional impairment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in function.
The results were calculated using the average change from baseline. Higher scores mean better outcome.
Negative mean indicates worsening of function. Positive mean indicates improvement of function.
Time frame: Day 169
The MMSE assesses several aspects of memory and cognitive functioning including orientation, attention, concentration, comprehension, recall, and praxis. The total possible score is 30, with high scores indicating less impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in cognition.
Time frame: Day 169
Scores were on a scale of 0 through 3, with 0=no dementia, 0.5=questionable dementia, 1=mild dementia, 2=moderate dementia, and 3=severe dementia. Cognitive and functional abilities that were assessed include Memory; Orientation; Judgment and Problem Solving; Community Affairs; Home and Hobbies; and Personal Care. Memory was considered as the primary driver for scoring and the other categories were secondary. The change from baseline in the CDR-SB total score was analyzed using the mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Change from baseline is calculated as the observed value minus the baseline value. Higher scores mean worsening of disease.
Time frame: Day 169
The scale consists of a format with which a clinician may address clinically relevant overall change, including 15 areas under the domains of cognition, behavior, and social and daily functioning. For ADCS-CGIC, the individual data listing presented the original score on the seven-point scale. In addition, the seven-point score was collapsed to 3 groups, combining scores 1-3 to "Improved", 4 to "No change", and 5-7 to "Worsening". Lower scores indicate improvement.
Time frame: Day169
The Cognitive composite included:
Each individual z-score was calculated by first computing the baseline mean and standard deviation at baseline for all subjects within each individual component. The z-scores were then derived for each subject and timepoint by subtracting the corresponding baseline mean from the observed value and then dividing by the standard deviation at baseline. The sign of the z-score for the following components was reversed when deriving the Composite scores: Word recall, Orientation, Delayed Word Recall, Word Recognition, Maze, TMT A, TMT B.
Z-score = 0 represents the population at baseline
Positive Z-score = indicates improvement
Negative Z-score= indicates worsening
Time frame: Day169
The memory composite includes 4 ADAS-COG (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognition subscale) items: word recall, orientation, delayed word recall, word recognition. The Memory composite score will be a composite z-score average similar to the Cognitive Composite score but will only be derived using the average of the ADAS-Cog Word Recall, Orientation, Delayed Word Recall, and Word Recognition items. If a subject is missing any of the four items at a timepoint, this composite score will not be derived.
The score was calculated using z-scores of the items cited above where:
Z-score = 0 represents the population at baseline.
Positive Z-score = indicates improvement
Negative Z-score= indicates worsening
Time frame: Day 169
The Attention composite score included:
The score was calculated using z-scores of the items cited above where:
Z-score = 0 represents the population at baseline.
Positive Z-score = indicates improvement
Negative Z-score= indicates worsening
Time frame: Day 169
The Executive composite included
The score was calculated using z-scores of the items cited above where:
Z-score = 0 represents the population at baseline.
Positive Z-score = indicates improvement
Negative Z-score= indicates worsening
Cognition Therapeutics
Industry
A Pilot Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) PET Study to Evaluate the Effect of CT1812 Treatment on Synaptic Density in Participants With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04865172
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06347172
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05529706
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details