YMCA of San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94105, United States
NCT Number: NCT05529706
This is a validation study to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Brain Health Program, a multimodal curriculum covering dementia risk factors and evidence-based change interventions. The goal of this study is to evaluate the Brain Health Program in individuals with identified risk factors for the onset of dementia and to prepare for a large-scale efficacy trial in this population.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94105, United States
This study will employ an evidence-based Brain Health Program curriculum, which involves a twelve-week, group-administered, personalized program designed to improve brain health in individuals with identified risk factors for the onset of dementia. This is a single-arm open-label feasibility study, enrolling older adults with Alzheimer's disease risk factors in a public health, community-deployed, group-based and individualized multimodal Brain Health Program (targeting, among other domains, diet, exercise and cognitive exercise), with a set of baseline assessments intended to characterize the population, and outcome measure to evaluate the usability of the program, as well as preliminary efficacy to reduce dementia risk factors.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Brain Health Program employs 1-hour/week group-based training and education regarding modifiable Alzheimer's disease dementia risk factors delivered over a 12-week period. Participants will be assigned into a group of up to 20 participants, and participants will engage the Brain Health Program collaboratively, as administered by the program content leader (instructor), while also being monitored and supported by the tech leader (in accordance with the Diabetes Prevention Program model).
Time frame: At 12 weeks
NPS (Net Promoter Score) is a whole number on a scale of -100 to +100, calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters. Promoters (score 9-10) are likely to exhibit value-creating behaviors, such as referring other potential program participants. Detractors (score 0-6) are less likely to do so. Passives (score 7-8) fall in between. Passives count toward the total number of respondents, which decreases the percentage of Promoters and Detractors and pushes the score toward 0. Higher score is better.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was easy to comprehend. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was relevant. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program effectively raised awareness about brain health and how to manage it. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the work assigned in the program was reasonable. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program helped to make a positive lifestyle change. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Time frame: At 12 weeks
One of the post-program survey questions asked participants whether the program was satisfying. This was measured on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("totally disagree") to 7 ("totally agree"). Higher score means a better outcome.
Posit Science Corporation
Industry
Acronym: C-BBHP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06347172
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT04121858
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03682081
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details