Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Health Sciences
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07168967
The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the Planetary Health Diet (EAT-Lancet) dietary pattern, chronotype, and psychological well-being in obese individuals. A total of 97 individuals diagnosed with obesity were included in the study. A questionnaire form containing sociodemographic characteristics was administered to volunteers who agreed to participate in the study. In addition, participants' anthropometric measurements (body weight, height, waist and hip circumference, Body Mass Index (BMI)), biochemical parameters (fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP)), and nutritional status (food consumption record and frequency) were obtained. The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire was used to determine chronotype. The Psychological Well-Being Scale was used for psychological assessment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
Mood disorders are common in obese individuals, and anxiety and depression often contribute to weight gain through emotional eating and inactivity. Therefore, including psychological support in obesity prevention and treatment programs is important for long-term weight loss goals. However, chronotype, which describes an individual's behavioral preferences such as sleep timing and eating, is also an important factor in determining both physical and mental health outcomes. An inappropriate chronotype has been associated with a more unfavorable body composition, poor mental health, and an increased risk of depression and anxiety. A review of the literature reveals no studies that simultaneously address the Planetary Health Diet (EAT-Lancet) dietary model, chronotype, and psychological well-being variables in obese individuals; this highlights the originality and necessity of the present study. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the EAT-Lancet dietary model, chronotype, and psychological well-being in obese individuals.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 3 months
Sociodemographic characteristics of the individuals (age, gender, smoking and alcohol use, constipation status, swallowing-chewing problem) were questioned.
Time frame: 3 months
BW was measured using a calibrated digital scale placed on a flat, tiled surface. The scale was sensitive to 100 grams.
Time frame: 3 months
Height was measured using a stadiometer with the participant's head positioned in the Frankfort plane and feet placed together.
Time frame: 3 months
WC was measured at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest (cristal point) using a flexible measuring tape.
Time frame: 3 months
HC was measured at the widest point of the hips using a flexible measuring tape.
Time frame: 3 months
BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in meters): BMI = weight (kg) / height² (m²).
Time frame: 3 months
Fasting blood glucose was measured using standard laboratory techniques during routine outpatient visits.
Time frame: 3 months
Triglyceride levels were measured via fasting blood samples analyzed in the outpatient clinic laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months
LDL-cholesterol was measured from fasting serum samples using standard enzymatic colorimetric methods.
Time frame: 3 months
Total cholesterol was measured using routine biochemical analysis in a certified laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months
Serum albumin levels were measured using routine laboratory procedures in outpatient visits.
Time frame: 3 months
Serum vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were assessed using chemiluminescence immunoassay methods in the outpatient clinic laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months
Serum folic acid levels were measured using standard automated immunoassay techniques.immunoassay methods in the outpatient clinic laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months
Serum vitamin B12 concentrations were measured using automated chemiluminescent immunoassay.immunoassay methods in the outpatient clinic laboratory.
Time frame: 3 months
The foods consumed by individuals in the last month were evaluated across seven different groups, including five basic food groups (meat and meat products, milk and dairy products, bread and grains, vegetables and fruits, sugar and fats), beverages, and fast food. Participants were asked how often they consumed foods and beverages in these groups; responses were collected using the following options: "every meal," "every day," "5-6 days a week," "3-4 days a week," "1-2 days a week," "once every 15 days," "once a month," and "never." To determine the average daily consumption amounts based on consumption frequency, the following coefficients were used: 3 for "every meal," 1 for "every day," 0.7855 for "5-6 times a week," 0.498 for "3-4 times a week," 0.2145 for "1-2 times a week," 0.067 for "every 15 days," and 0.033 for "once a month.
Time frame: 3 months
Responses regarding food consumption frequency were calculated using food consumption frequency calculations. The amounts of food and beverages consumed were multiplied by "3" for "every meal," '1' for "every day," "0.7855" for "5-6 times a week," "0.498" for "3-4 times a week," "0.2145" for "1-2 times a week," "0.067" for "every 15 days," and "0.033" for "once a month" to obtain the average daily amounts. Energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients were calculated using the daily intake amount.
Time frame: 3 months
In this study, the EAT-Lancet diet score was used. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was scored based on the estimated average daily intake of 14 dietary components. Each component was rated as 0 (non-compliance) or 1 point (compliance), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 14 points.
Time frame: 3 months
Individuals' chronotype eating patterns were determined using the Morning-Evening Questionnaire. The Morning-Evening Questionnaire consists of a total of 19 questions. The questionnaire contains questions about individuals' physical and psychological performance during a 24-hour period, which time of day they perform better, and their preferences regarding sleep and wakefulness times. As a result of the evaluation, those who scored between 70 and 86 were classified as "Definitely Morning Type"; those scoring between 59 and 69 are classified as "Close to Morning Type"; those scoring between 42 and 58 are classified as "Intermediate Type"; those scoring between 31 and 41 are classified as "Close to Evening Type"; and those scoring between 16 and 30 are classified as "Definitely Evening Type."
Time frame: 3 months
Individuals were psychologically assessed using the Psychological Well-Being Scale. The scale defines many important elements, ranging from feeling satisfied with positive relationships to having a purposeful and meaningful life. There are 8 items on the scale. Each item is answered on a scale of 1 to 7, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). When all items are answered with "strongly disagree," the total test score is 8; when answered with "strongly agree," the total test score is 56. A high score on the test indicates that the individual has abundant psychological resources and strengths.
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Other
The Relationship Between Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet and Chronotype and Psychological Well-Being: A Study in Obese Individuals
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07289438
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07368855
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06171945
Behavior, Body Weight
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06861049
Behavior, Body Weight
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details