Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
NCT Number: NCT00740727
Test whether Basic Life Support (BLS) providers can successfully place Enzymatically Augmented Subcutaneous Infusion (EASI) Access lines for subcutaneous infusion, and characterize intravascular absorption of EASI-administered (tracer-labelled) glucose (D5W).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
150u HRH administered via EASI access line, prior to infusion of 250 D5W (5% dextrose in water)
Other names: Hylenex
Subjects will under placement of an EASI line. This entails placement of a small (20-gauge) catheter in the upper back, in the subcutaneous space.
Time frame: 1 day
Ability of Basic Life Support (BLS) providers to place EASI access lines.
The unit of analysis is the 18 BLS participants (these were also the 18 individuals in whom the EASI access lines were placed).
Time frame: 1 day
Number of subjects (out of a possible 18) in whom EASI-administered tracer-labeled glucose was absorbed systemically.Gas chromatography/Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on timed phlebotomy samples, to assess for tracer-labeled glucose.Isotopic glucose enrichment was determined by plasma analysis on a Hewlett-Packard 5985B quadruple mass spectrometer, using + chemical ionization (methane reagent gas). A 12m×0.20mm ID, OV-1 capillary column (He carrier) was used in the gas chromatograph.Enrichments of glucose were calculated as atom percent excess relative to natural background level.
Time frame: 1 day
Assessment during EASI placement & initial infusion, for pain as assessed with 10-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain). Significant pain was defined a priori as a pain score of at least 3.
Time frame: 2 days
Assessment during upon next-day follow-up, for pain as assessed with 10-point scale (0=no pain; 10=worst pain). Significant pain was defined a priori as a pain score of at least 3.
Presence of any pain (yes or no question and then numeric rating if pain was present) was assessed upon follow-up by telephone; on this follow-up a yes/no question was also asked about any complications at infusion site (in the upper back).
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
Enzymatically Augmented Subcutaneous Infusion (EASI) Access II Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05388071
Disaster Medicine, Emergency Medicine
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07361835
Crush Injuries, Disaster Medicine
Muğla, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07669909
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Sfax, Sfax Governorate, Tunisia
View Trial DetailsNCT06206434
Dehydration, Fluid Therapy
Athens, Greece
View Trial Details