Pulmonary valve replacement
ProcedureSurgical implantation of an adult-sized (≥ 18 mm) homograft or Contegra graft as right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit under cardiopulmonary bypass through a sternotomy.
NCT Number: NCT04084132
Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) is a congenital heart defect with four major features including right ventricular outflow tract obstruction. About 25 children are born with this condition in Denmark every year. Corrective surgery is usually performed within the first year. In 50 % of patients, enlargement with a patch is necessary to achieve relief of the outflow tract obstruction. This however results in severe pulmonary regurgitation, which eventually leads to volume overload, right ventricular dysfunction and arrhythmia. To avoid these late complications, pulmonary valve replacement with a prosthesis if performed when patients meet the current guideline criteria. Most patients meet the guideline criteria for revalving when they are between 20 and 30 years of age. The current guidelines however, are based solely on retrospective studies and novel research reveals that in more than 50 % of patients who are treated according to current practice, right ventricular volumes and function as well as exercise capacity and burden of arrhythmia do not normalize or improve. 500 patients with ToF will be enrolled in a multicentre, cross-sectional study, which will yield information about the long-term outcomes after initial repair of ToF, as well as suggestions about the optimal timing for re-valving. Among patients included in the cross-sectional study, 120 patients with free pulmonary regurgitation, will be randomized evenly for early or later re-valving with at least 10-years of follow-up, for evaluation of long-term efficacy and safety of early re-valving.
Interested in participating?
Request Info12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical implantation of an adult-sized (≥ 18 mm) homograft or Contegra graft as right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit under cardiopulmonary bypass through a sternotomy.
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (mL) indexed by body surface area (m2) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Higher right ventricular end-diastolic volumes are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
The rate of deceased patients (irrespective of the cause of death) and total number of patients will be calculated for both the early and later re-valving group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference between the groups will be performed.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
Right ventricular end-systolic volume (mL) indexed by body surface area (m2) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Higher right ventricular end-systolic volumes are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
Right ventricular ejection fraction (%) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Lower right ventricular ejection fraction are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (mL) indexed by body surface area (m2) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Higher left ventricular end-diastolic volumes are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (mL) indexed by body surface area (m2) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Higher left ventricular end-systolic volumes are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) will be assessed in both the early re-valving group and later re-valving group for calculation of the mean in each group and analysis of statistical significance of the difference will be performed. Lower left ventricular ejection fraction are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
The rate of patients with bleeding classified as minor, major and life-threatening bleeding (BARC classification) related to the re-valving procedure and the total number of patients will be calculated in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference between the groups will be analyzed for statistical significance.
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
The rate of acute kidney injury categorized as stage one, two and three (KDIGO classification) and the total number of patients will be calculated in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients who decease due to cardiovascular causes and patients who suffer from a disabling stroke after the time of randomization will be calculated for both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients who decease due to a cardiovascular cause and the total number of patients will be calculated in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients who suffer from a disabling stroke og transient ischemic attack after the time of randomization will be calculated in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean New York Heart Association Class categorized as 1-4 will be assessed in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance. Higher mean values are considered a worse outcome.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean health-asssociated quality of life will be assessed in both the early and later revalving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance. EQ-5D-3L will be used for assessment. The questionnaires are available in Danish. Higher values are considered better outcomes.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean health-associated quality of life will be assessed in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance. EQ-5D-Y will be used for assessment. The questionnaires are available in Danish. Higher values are considered better outcomes.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients with new supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmia and the total number of patients will be calculated for both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean peak oxygen consumption (VO2/min) indexed to body weight (kg) will be assessed for patients in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference in means will be analyzed for statistical significance. Higher mean values are considered a better outcomes.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The median time until structural valve deterioration defined as time until need for valve replacement in patients who are revalved during the study will be calculated.
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients who suffer from endocarditis after re-valving during the course of the study and the total number of patients who are revalved during the study will be calculated
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The rate of patients who suffer from prosthetic valve thrombosis after re-valving during the course of the study and the total number of patients who are revalved during the study will be calculated
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean number of contacts to the health system defined as composite of hospital admissions, outpatient contacts and contacts to the general practitioner will be calculated in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance
Time frame: Assessed once every year for 10 years after randomization
The mean number of children will be assessed for female patient in both the early and later re-valving group and the difference will be analyzed for statistical significance
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Other
Early Versus Later Re-valving in Tetralogy of Fallot With Free Pulmonary Regurgitation - Combined Cross-sectional and Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized, Parallel-group Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05378386
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03130777
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01824160
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03983512
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
München, Germany
View Trial Details