UHHeidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
NCT Number: NCT02377167
Patients with severe ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, who require mechanical ventilation, have a particularly bad prognosis. If they require long-term ventilation, their orotracheal tube needs to be, like in any other intensive care patient, replaced by a shorter tracheal tube below the larynx. This so called tracheostomy might be associated with advantages such as less demand of narcotics and pain killers, less lesions in mouth and larynx, better mouth hygiene, safer airway, more patient comfort and earlier mobilisation. The best timepoint for tracheostomy in stroke, however, is not known. Preliminary data from a pilot study of early tracheostomy in patients with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke suggest that such patients may also have improved survival and long-term functional outcomes, but a large, multicenter clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
Background: According to United States data from the National Inpatient Sample, about 1.3% of 1.5 million patients (20,300) hospitalized with ischemic stroke from 2007-2009 underwent tracheostomy - while the number of tracheostomies performed for hemorrhagic stroke is unknown. Historically, mechanically ventilated patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes have had poor functional outcomes, and care of such patients is extremely expensive. Effective interventions to improve survival, improve functional recovery, decrease costs, and increase cost-effectiveness are urgently needed. Early tracheostomy of selected medical and surgical patients allows for dramatically decreased sedation and analgesia, and is associated with improved outcomes. Preliminary data from a pilot study of early tracheostomy in patients with hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke suggest that such patients may also have improved survival and long-term functional outcomes, but a large, multicenter clinical trial is needed to confirm these findings.
Method: SETPOINT 2 is a prospective, randomized, controlled, outcome observer-blinded, multicenter, two-armed, comparative trial. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either the experimental group - who undergo percutaneous tracheostomy (PDT) as soon as feasible and within 5 days after intubation ("early tracheostomy") or to the control group ("standard of care" group), in which PDT is performed after day 10 from intubation if the application of an in-house weaning protocol did not lead to successful extubation. Otherwise, no differences in intensive care treatment are intended, and each participating institution's standard operating procedures will be applied to ensure uniform management decisions in fields such as weaning, ventilation, analgesia and sedation, transfusion, and neurological monitoring and management. Blinding to the treatment assignment is impossible for treating physicians, patients and legal representatives as well as for most of the investigators. However, the primary endpoint of long-term outcome and causes of mortality will be assessed by trial-independent adjudicators blinded to the timing of tracheostomy.
The study started as an investigator initiated study which was conducted with limited external funding. Some funding (about 50 000 Euros) was provided from third party funds by the principal investigator and other foundations to provide for data management by the IMBI and other organizational aspects of the study. The principal investigator and the US co-principle investigator-David B. Seder, M.D.) together applied for research funding to several foundations and medical associations and in December 2016 received confirmation of funding from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Based on this award, some additional endpoints (e.g. neuromonitoring, patient and family experience) were added as secondary endpoints in this study. The core version of this study remained unchanged. There will be no industry funding of the SETPOINT 2 study. This is not an investigation of any specific medical products or medications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tracheostomy is performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheostomy with tracheostomy kit by neurointensivists whenever possible. If anatomically or otherwise indicated, surgical tracheostomy is applied.
Time frame: 6 months
Dichotomized functional outcome (a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-4 (favorable outcome) vs 5,6 (poor outcome)) at 6 months after admission to ICU
Time frame: 6 months
This secondary endpoint is assessed as time and type of death during the ICU-stay and 6 months after admission.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days spent at the recruiting hospital from admission to discharge.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days on the ventilator until the patient is ventilator-independent for 24 h.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of weaning, an expected average of 6 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under the possible application of a weaning protocol, and spent within specific phases of such a protocol.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days requiring the application of sedatives and analgesics which are also specified.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as days from admission to a pre-defined status that would allow discharge from ICU (absence of active infection, vasopressors, pulmonary and cardial instability etc.)
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
This secondary endpoint is assessed as half-days spent under vasopressors during ICU-stay
Time frame: 10 days post tracheostomy
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the number and types of complications arelated to tracheostomy (i.e. bleeding, mispositioning, malfunction, replacement demand,etc.).
Time frame: admission and discharge
This secondary endpoint is assessed as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the above named timepoints.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
evaluation of consciousness and sedation score
Time frame: at discharge and after 6 month
assessment of the caregiver burden at the time of discharge from the NCCU and after 6 months
Time frame: after 6 month
assessment of the patient and caregiver burden after 6 month
University Hospital Heidelberg
Other
Stroke-Related Early Tracheostomy Versus Prolonged Orotracheal Intubation in Neurocritical Care Trial 2
Acronym: SETPOINT2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01804439
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Acute Myocardial Infarction
View Trial DetailsNCT03820843
Aphasia, Brain Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03826875
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02315443
Acute Cerebral Ischemia, Brain Diseases
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial Details