Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05576649

Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment in a P300 Speller Task for Attention Training

This study compares different adaptation approaches in a P300-based BCI neurofeedback training to improve short-term attention. Participants will spell several words on a computer by focusing on a letter on the screen while their brain activity is recorded (P300 speller). The difficulty of this task will be adapted to train their attention. Their cognitive abilities will be evaluated using a random dot kinematogram, where they are asked to indicate the direction a fraction of moving dots on the computer screen is going in, before and after the training to analyse any improvements. Questionnaires will be used to compare the perceived task load of the different adaptation approaches.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Attention

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Maynooth University

Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

About this study

Healthy participants will complete several runs in a P300-speller task, where the number of flashes per row and column is progressively adapted to their performance (in control group 1 and experimental group) or chosen randomly (in control group 2). Decreasing the number of flashes per row and column makes it harder for the computer to identify the letter the participant is focusing on, which encourages them to improve their focus to maintain their performance. The number of flashes can therefore be interpreted as the task difficulty of the P300 speller task.

The participants will complete a continuous version of the random dot kinematogram, where a fraction of incoherently moving dots will start moving coherently. The participants are asked to indicate which direction these dots are moving in. This task is completed before and after the P300 speller training, so that response times in the task can be compared.

To evaluate the perceived task load of the different adaptation approaches, the participants will complete a questionnaire about fatigue and boredom before and after the training session, as well as the NASA Task Load Index at the end of the experiment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years and older
  • able to consent
  • normal or corrected-to-normal vision

Exclusion criteria

  • history of neurological or cognitive illnesses
  • negative reaction to electroconductive gel used in the study (an allergy patch test will be carried out before the experiment starts)
  • illiteracy

Treatment and study plan

Task difficulty adaptation according to Arvaneh et al. (2019)

Other

The task difficulty in the P300 speller training will be adapted according to Arvaneh et al. (2019).

Random task difficulty

Other

The task difficulty in the P300 speller training is chosen randomly.

Task difficulty adaptation according to iterative learning controller

Other

The task difficulty in the P300 speller is determined by an iterative learning controller.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in response times in the random dot motion task

    Time frame: Measured immediately before and after the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in mean response times for correct responses in the random dot motion task from pre- to post-training is analysed.

  2. Change in accuracy in the random dot motion task

    Time frame: Measured immediately before and after the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in mean accuracy, i.e. number of correct responses over total number of targets, in the random dot motion task from pre- to post-training is analysed.

  3. Change in total power of EEG signals

    Time frame: Measured over the course of the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in mean total power of EEG signals between 150ms to 550ms post-stimulus for target and non-target trials in the P300 speller task is analysed.

  4. Change in alpha power of EEG signals

    Time frame: Measured over the course of the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in mean power of the alpha rhythm in the first 150ms after a non-target stimulus in the P300 speller task is analysed.

  5. Length of training

    Time frame: Measured over the course of the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The length of the P300 training phase is compared between groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in spelling accuracy in P300 speller task

    Time frame: Measured immediately before and after the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in mean spelling accuracy, i.e. correctly identified letters over all letters in a run, from pre-training to post-training P300 speller runs is analysed.

  2. Change in responses to questionnaire

    Time frame: Measured immediately before and after the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The change in responses to the questionnaire about boredom and fatigue pre- and post-training is analysed. Participants answer the following 4 questions on a 10 point likert scale:(1) How tired are you now?, (2) How alert do you feel?, (3) How bored do you feel?, (4) Do your eyes feel tired? The higher the change in score of the responses, the more tiresome and/or boring the training session was for the participant.

  3. Response to NASA Task Load Index questionnaire

    Time frame: Measured immediately after the training block in the experimental session (~1 hour and 30 minutes total)

    The response to the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire post-training is analysed. Participants evaluate mental, physical and temporal demand of the task, as well as their performance, effort and frustration regarding the task on a 21-point scale. A higher score means a higher perceived workload of the training.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National University of Ireland, Maynooth

Other

Collaborators

  • Dublin City University
  • Irish Research Council

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 12, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 22, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.